» Articles » PMID: 39748242

Evaluation of Health-related Quality of Life Changes in an Australian Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2025 Jan 3
PMID 39748242
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of absolute cardiovascular risk counselling on quality-of-life indices within a chest pain clinic.

Data Sources And Study Setting: Primary data was collected at the Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia, between 2014 and 2020.

Study Design: Patients attending an Australian chest pain clinic were randomised into a prospective, open-label, blinded-endpoint study over a minimum 12-months follow-up.

Data Collection / Extraction Methods: The SF-36 questionnaire was completed at baseline/follow-up and SF-6D multi-attribute utility instrument's health state utilities (HSU) were generated using SF-36 responses and the SF-6D's Australian tariff. SF-6D minimal important difference was 0.04 points. Absolute cardiovascular risk was also stratified into high/intermediate/low-risk categories for exploratory analysis of summary HSUs and dimensional scores. ANZCTR registration number 12617000615381 (registered 28/4/17).

Principal Findings: Of n = 189 patients enrolled, HSUs were generated for 96% at baseline (intervention n = 93, usual care n = 88) and 61% at follow-up. There were no statistical differences in age, sex, absolute cardiovascular risk or mean HSU between groups at baseline. Summary HSUs improved more for the intervention group and the median between-group difference exceeded the minimal important difference threshold (intervention 0.16 utility points, control 0.10 utility points). For Intervention patients with high absolute risk (≥ 15%), HSU did not significantly change.

Conclusions: Absolute cardiovascular risk counselling in a chest pain clinic yielded clinically meaningful improvement in health-related quality of life.

References
1.
Campbell J, Palmer A, Venn A, Sharman M, Otahal P, Neil A . A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery. Patient. 2016; 9(4):311-22. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0157-5. View

2.
Fox K, Tenkorang J, Rogers A, Wood D . Are rapid access cardiology clinics a valued part of a district cardiology service?. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 137(1):42-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.026. View

3.
Skinner E, Denehy L, Warrillow S, Hawthorne G . Comparison of the measurement properties of the AQoL and SF-6D in critical illness. Crit Care Resusc. 2013; 15(3):205-12. View

4.
Anderson K, Wilson P, Odell P, Kannel W . An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991; 83(1):356-62. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.356. View

5.
Webster R, Heeley E . Perceptions of risk: understanding cardiovascular disease. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012; 3:49-60. PMC: 3270917. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S8288. View