» Articles » PMID: 39748237

Impact of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage to Control Intracranial Hypertension in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: a Retrospective Monocentric Cohort

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2025 Jan 3
PMID 39748237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: External lumbar drainage (ELD) of cerebrospinal fluid may help control intracranial pressure following a traumatic brain injury. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ELD in post-traumatic intracranial hypertension (IH).

Methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in the trauma critical care unit of the regional Level-I trauma centre between January 2012 and December 2022. All traumatic brain injury patients with IH (≥ 22 mmHg despite optimal sedation) were included. Data collection focused on the duration and management of IH, complications related to ELD, and outcomes (6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]). The influence of ELD on the duration of IH was assessed using a multivariable Cox regression analysis, while its impact on the 6-month GOS ("unfavourable outcome" GOS 1-3, "good outcome" GOS 4-5) was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: Ninety patients (mean age 37 [SD, 16], injury severity score [ISS] 29 [IQR, 24-34]) were analyzed during the study period. Of these, 50 (56%) benefited from an ELD during their hospitalization (ELD group). The IH duration was significantly reduced in the ELD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.87; p = 0.03]). One patient (2%) experienced a cerebral herniation following ELD placement, and two others (4%) developed device-associated meningitis. The ELD group was significantly associated with a lower likelihood of an unfavourable outcome (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.13-0.77]; p = 0.011) compared to the no ELD group.

Conclusion: ELD appears in our cohort to be a safe and effective strategy to control post-traumatic IH, with an acceptable benefit-risk ratio. Our analysis even suggests a potential outcome improvement in patients treated by ELD compared with those having no cerebrospinal fluid drainage.

References
1.
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond M, Brooks N . Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981; 44(4):285-93. PMC: 490949. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285. View

2.
Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Steiner L, Hiler M, Smielewski P . Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury. Neurocrit Care. 2006; 4(1):8-13. DOI: 10.1385/NCC:4:1:008. View

3.
Huyette D, Turnbow B, Kaufman C, Vaslow D, Whiting B, Oh M . Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108(1):88-91. DOI: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/01/0088. View

4.
Hutchinson P, Kolias A, Timofeev I, Corteen E, Czosnyka M, Timothy J . Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(12):1119-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1605215. View

5.
Hawryluk G, Aguilera S, Buki A, Bulger E, Citerio G, Cooper D . A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC). Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(12):1783-1794. PMC: 6863785. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05805-9. View