» Articles » PMID: 39747790

Analysis of Spatial Patellofemoral Alignment Using Novel Three-dimensional Measurements Based on Weight-bearing Cone-beam CT

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2025 Jan 3
PMID 39747790
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To propose a reliable and standard 3D assessment method to analyze the effect of weight-bearing (WB) status on the location of patella and clarify the diagnostic performance of 3D parameters for recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in WB and non-weight-bearing (NWB) conditions.

Methods: Sixty-five knees of RPD patients and 99 knees of controls were included. Eight landmarks, two lines and a coordinate system were defined on 3D bone models of knees based on weight-bearing CT and non-weight-bearing CT. The shift and tilt of patella in three orthogonal axes (X, Y, Z, X, Y, Z) were evaluated.

Results: X and Y were significantly higher, Z, X and Y were significantly lower in WB condition than NWB condition (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.010). In both WB and NWB conditions, X, Y and Z were significantly higher, and X was significantly lower in the RPD group than the control group (WB/NWB: p < 0.001/p = 0.002, p < 0.001/p = 0.001, p < 0.001/p < 0.001, p < 0.001/p = 0.009). In WB condition, Z and Y were significantly higher in the RPD group than the control group (p = 0.011, p < 0.001). Z had the best diagnostic performance for RPD in both WB and NWB conditions, with AUC of 0.887 (95% CI: 0.828, 0.946) and 0.885 (95% CI: 0.822, 0.947), respectively.

Conclusions: The 3D measurement method reliably and comprehensively reflected the relative spatial position relationship of the patellofemoral joint. It can be applied to the 3D preoperative planning of patellofemoral procedures. In addition, patellofemoral evaluation under the WB condition was essential to detect subtle underlying risk factors for RPD, with axial lateral patellar tilt being the best predictor.

Critical Relevance Statement: This 3D measurement method under weight-bearing conditions contributes to comprehensively describing the relative spatial position of the patellofemoral joint in a standardized way and can be applied to preoperative evaluation for recurrent patellar dislocation.

Key Points: Patellofemoral alignment is a 3D problem, and the accuracy of 2D parameters has been questioned. 3D measurement was reliable and comprehensively reflected relative spatial relationships of the patellofemoral joint. 3D measurements under weight-bearing condition help preoperative evaluation for RPD.

References
1.
Sherman S, Gudeman A . Editorial Commentary: Evaluation of Patellofemoral Instability Is Complex and Multifactorial. Arthroscopy. 2023; 39(11):2352-2353. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.026. View

2.
Fithian D, Paxton E, Stone M, Silva P, Davis D, Elias D . Epidemiology and natural history of acute patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(5):1114-21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546503260788. View

3.
Shibanuma N, Sheehan F, Stanhope S . Limb positioning is critical for defining patellofemoral alignment and femoral shape. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (434):198-206. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000155078.52475.63. View

4.
Carrillon Y, Abidi H, Dejour D, Fantino O, Moyen B, Tran-Minh V . Patellar instability: assessment on MR images by measuring the lateral trochlear inclination-initial experience. Radiology. 2000; 216(2):582-5. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.216.2.r00au07582. View

5.
Hirschmann M, Konala P, Amsler F, Iranpour F, Friederich N, Cobb J . The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(5):629-33. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25893. View