» Articles » PMID: 39744898

Physical Activity in Professional Training of Physiotherapists

Overview
Journal Ann Med
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2025 Jan 2
PMID 39744898
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The current negative trend in the physical behavior and lifestyle of the population therefore requires adequate changes in the professional training of physiotherapists.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the structure and differences in the weekly physical activity (PA) of Czech physiotherapy students, the use of wearables in physiotherapy professional training, and the attitude of physiotherapy students toward PA and the use of wearables in physiotherapy practice.

Methods: Between 2013 and 2022, 412 physiotherapy students participated in a PA-monitoring study using questonnaires International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form, Motives for Physical Activity Measure-Revise, pedometers, Garmin Vívofit and Axivity AX3 accelerometers.

Results: A retrospective analysis of physiotherapy students PA drew attention to insufficient weekly PA and insufficient achievement of the PA recommendation of at least 60 min five times a week (55% of men and 41% of women). Instrumental PA monitoring allowed analyzing individual daily PA and structure of weekly PA. Highest PA indicated men (14,102 steps/day) and women (12,724 steps/day) of the 1st study year on Tuesday. The lowest PA (9,488 steps/day for men and 8,815 steps/day for women), were observed in the 4th study year on Sundays. The recommended target of 11,000 steps per day was achieved by 40% of the men and 46% of the women. Wearables enhanced participants PA motivation (51%).

Conclusions: The inclusion of weekly PA monitoring in the professional training of physiotherapists ensured a deeper insight into the possibilities of PA monitoring in physiotherapy practice . Students are prepared to use wearables more widely to improve physical therapy practice.

References
1.
Ranasinghe C, Sigera C, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, Ranasinghe A, Hills A . Physical inactivity among physiotherapy undergraduates: exploring the knowledge-practice gap. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2016; 8:39. PMC: 5142393. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-016-0063-8. View

2.
Treacy D, Hassett L, Schurr K, Chagpar S, Paul S, Sherrington C . Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting. Phys Ther. 2017; 97(5):581-588. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzx010. View

3.
Moore K, OShea E, Kenny L, Barton J, Tedesco S, Sica M . Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021; 9(6):e23832. PMC: 8212622. DOI: 10.2196/23832. View

4.
McGrath R, Verdon S, Parnell T, Pope R . Australian physiotherapists' perceived frequency of contact with clients experiencing distress: A cross-sectional survey. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023; 40(8):1669-1686. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2204962. View

5.
Craig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth M, Ainsworth B . International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8):1381-95. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB. View