» Articles » PMID: 39744488

Random Survival Forest Predicts Survival in Patients with Metastatic Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer and the Prognostic Benefits of Surgery and Radiotherapy

Overview
Journal J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2025 Jan 2
PMID 39744488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers are prominent within head and neck malignancies. The diagnosis of distant metastasis (DM) invariably signals poor prognosis, underscoring the need to optimize current treatment approaches. Patient data for metastatic laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer were extracted from the SEER database (2000-2020). Cox regression and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses identified independent prognostic factors and performed stratified survival analyses based on the receipt of primary tumor surgery and radiotherapy. A random survival forest (RSF) model was subsequently developed to predict patient survival. A total of 1,626 patients were included. PSM-based stratified analysis revealed that primary tumor surgery significantly improved survival in patients under 70 years and those with primary laryngeal cancer. Radiotherapy enhanced survival across all age groups, with a benefit primarily for patients with primary laryngeal cancer and squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC). The RSF model demonstrated robust predictive performance, highlighting chemotherapy, primary tumor surgery, and radiotherapy as the top three factors influencing patient survival. The clinical and pathological features of metastatic laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer were systematically analyzed using an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict survival. Subgroup analyses identified patients most likely to benefit from primary tumor surgery and radiotherapy. These findings may guide the development of personalized treatment strategies, potentially improving the prognosis of patients with DM.

References
1.
Cannon R, Carpenter P, Boothe D, Buchmann L, Hunt J, Lloyd S . Academic Facility Utilization and Survival Outcomes in Adult Head and Neck Sarcomas: An NCDB Analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 159(3):473-483. DOI: 10.1177/0194599818768495. View

2.
Plichta J, Thomas S, Hayes D, Chavez-MacGregor M, Allison K, De los Santos J . Novel Prognostic Staging System for Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(14):2546-2560. PMC: 10414698. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02222. View

3.
Florescu C, Thariat J . Local ablative treatments of oligometastases from head and neck carcinomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014; 91(1):47-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.01.004. View

4.
Bonomo P, Greto D, Desideri I, Loi M, Di Cataldo V, Orlandi E . Clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung-only oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Is the deferral of systemic therapy a potential goal?. Oral Oncol. 2019; 93:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.006. View

5.
Huang S, OSullivan B, Waldron J, Lockwood G, Bayley A, Kim J . Patterns of care in elderly head-and-neck cancer radiation oncology patients: a single-center cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 79(1):46-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.052. View