» Articles » PMID: 39741644

Is 70% Achievable? Hospital-Level Variation in Rates of Cardiac Rehabilitation Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Overview
Journal JACC Adv
Date 2025 Jan 1
PMID 39741644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite national goals to enroll 70% of cardiac rehabilitation (CR)-eligible patients, enrollment remains low.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the treating hospital influences CR enrollment nationally.

Methods: We included Fee-for-Service Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or heart valve repair/replacement. We examined: 1) a risk-standardized model to assess comparative hospital rates; 2) a linear regression model to identify hospital factors associated with rates of risk-standardized CR; and 3) a hierarchical generalized linear model to calculate the hospital median OR.

Results: At 3,420 hospitals, we identified 264,970 eligible patients. A minority of hospitals (n = 1,446; 38%) performed cardiac surgery, but these hospitals cared for the majority (n = 242,875; 92%) of all eligible patients. Subsequent analyses were limited to these hospitals. The median risk-standardized CR enrollment rate was low (22%) and varied 10-fold across hospitals (10th, 90th percentile: 3%, 42%). Factors associated with higher hospital performance were Midwest location, higher number of hospital beds, directly affiliated CR program, and <1 mile distance between the hospital and closest CR facility. The national hospital median OR was 2.1.

Conclusions: The treating hospital plays a key role in facilitating CR enrollment after discharge. Fewer than 1% of U.S. hospitals achieved a risk-standardized CR enrollment rate of >70%. Hospitals with cardiac surgery capability care for more than 90% of all CR-eligible patients and may be a logical place to focus improvement efforts.

References
1.
Grace S, Angevaare K, Reid R, Oh P, Anand S, Gupta M . Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient strategies in increasing referral and utilization of cardiac rehabilitation: a prospective, multi-site study. Implement Sci. 2012; 7:120. PMC: 3541119. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-120. View

2.
Thomas R, Balady G, Banka G, Beckie T, Chiu J, Gokak S . 2018 ACC/AHA Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71(16):1814-1837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.004. View

3.
Frechette K, Conley S, Tang A, Welch T . Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Rural Setting: OPTIMIZATION OF REFERRAL AND PARTICIPATION RATES. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018; 39(1):E4-E7. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000386. View

4.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View

5.
Heran B, Chen J, Ebrahim S, Moxham T, Oldridge N, Rees K . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (7):CD001800. PMC: 4229995. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2. View