Digital Supportive Supervision (DiSS) of Maternal Health, Child Health and Nutrition (MCHN) Service Delivery in Rajasthan, India: Study Protocol for Impact Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Dec 31

PMID 39740940

Authors

Shweta Sharda

Pranav Kshtriya

Praween Kumar Agrawal

Prakash Singh

Ajay Trakroo

Anurag Joshi

Anil Agarwal

Aarti Goyal

Luigi DAquino

Shubhra Singh

Raghuraj Singh

Shankar Prinja

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: A digital supportive supervision (DiSS) tool was developed and implemented in Rajasthan, India, to enhance the coverage and quality of maternal health, child health and nutrition (MCHN) services. This study aims to assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of DiSS compared to traditional paper-based supportive supervision.

Methods And Analysis: A quasi-experimental research design incorporating interrupted time series regression analysis will be employed to evaluate the impact of DiSS. Two districts from the high DiSS intensity group, defined as having at least 25% of the MCHN sessions supervised digitally, will be randomly selected as intervention districts. Two comparator districts will be selected from the low DiSS intensity group (less than 25% of MCHN sessions supervised digitally) after matching with intervention districts based on three indicators-female literacy, proportion of population belonging to scheduled caste or tribe and coverage of four antenatal care visits. District-level monthly data on the number of beneficiaries using MCHN services will be obtained from the state's routine health management information system. Key informants involved in supervising MCHN sessions will also be interviewed to complement the quantitative findings. A mixed micro-costing methodology, incorporating top-down and bottom-up approaches, for assessing the cost of implementing supervision in either scenario. A decision model will estimate long-term health outcomes, in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALY), in both the intervention and comparator groups. Cost-effectiveness of DiSS will be assessed by computing the incremental cost per QALY gained in the intervention versus comparator group.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of the PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (IEC No. IEC-03/2023-2671). The study results will be disseminated at research conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

References

Madede T, Sidat M, McAuliffe E, Patricio S, Uduma O, Galligan M . The impact of a supportive supervision intervention on health workers in Niassa, Mozambique: a cluster-controlled trial. Hum Resour Health. 2017; 15(1):58. PMC: 5581457. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-017-0213-4. View

Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A . Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 46(1):348-355. PMC: 5407170. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw098. View

Chib A, Van Velthoven M, Car J . mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun. 2014; 20(1):4-34. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735. View

Fernainy P, Cohen A, Murray E, Losina E, Lamontagne F, Sourial N . Rethinking the pros and cons of randomized controlled trials and observational studies in the era of big data and advanced methods: a panel discussion. BMC Proc. 2024; 18(Suppl 2):1. PMC: 10795211. DOI: 10.1186/s12919-023-00285-8. View

Trap B, Todd C, Moore H, Laing R . The impact of supervision on stock management and adherence to treatment guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Health Policy Plan. 2001; 16(3):273-80. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/16.3.273. View

Panda B, Pati S, Nallala S, Chauhan A, Anasuya A, Som M . How supportive supervision influences immunization session site practices: a quasi-experimental study in Odisha, India. Glob Health Action. 2015; 8:25772. PMC: 4297277. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.25772. View

Meh C, Sharma A, Ram U, Fadel S, Correa N, Snelgrove J . Trends in maternal mortality in India over two decades in nationally representative surveys. BJOG. 2021; 129(4):550-561. PMC: 9292773. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16888. View

Bello I, Lebo E, Shibeshi M, Akpan G, Chakauya J, Masresha B . Implementation of integrated supportive supervision in the context of coronavirus 19 pandemic: its effects on routine immunization and vaccine preventable surveillance diseases indicators in the East and Southern African countries. Pan Afr Med J. 2021; 38:164. PMC: 8077641. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.164.27349. View

Schweitzer J, Synowiec C . The economics of eHealth and mHealth. J Health Commun. 2012; 17 Suppl 1:73-81. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.649158. View

10.

Gopalakrishnan L, Diamond-Smith N, Avula R, Menon P, Fernald L, Walker D . Association between supportive supervision and performance of community health workers in India: a longitudinal multi-level analysis. Hum Resour Health. 2021; 19(1):145. PMC: 8627081. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-021-00689-7. View

11.

Prinja S, Rajsekhar K, Gauba V . Health technology assessment in India: Reflection & future roadmap. Indian J Med Res. 2021; 152(5):444-447. PMC: 8157896. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_115_19. View

12.

Prinja S, Bahuguna P, Faujdar D, Jyani G, Srinivasan R, Ghoshal S . Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination for adolescent girls in Punjab state: Implications for India's universal immunization program. Cancer. 2017; 123(17):3253-3260. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30734. View

13.

Kaphle S, Matheke-Fischer M, Lesh N . Effect of Performance Feedback on Community Health Workers' Motivation and Performance in Madhya Pradesh, India: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016; 2(2):e169. PMC: 5177738. DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.3381. View

14.

Avortri G, Nabukalu J, Nabyonga-Orem J . Supportive supervision to improve service delivery in low-income countries: is there a conceptual problem or a strategy problem?. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4(Suppl 9):e001151. PMC: 6797347. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001151. View

15.

Sharma D, Prinja S, Aggarwal A, Rajsekar K, Bahuguna P . Development of the Indian Reference Case for undertaking economic evaluation for health technology assessment. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023; 16:100241. PMC: 10485782. DOI: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100241. View

16.

Prinja S, Sharma A, Nimesh R, Sharma V, Gopal K, Badgaiyan N . Impact of National Health Mission on infant mortality in India: An interrupted time series analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021; 36(4):1143-1152. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3166. View

17.

Vasan A, Mabey D, Chaudhri S, Epstein H, Lawn S . Support and performance improvement for primary health care workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of intervention design and methods. Health Policy Plan. 2016; 32(3):437-452. PMC: 5400115. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw144. View

18.

Penfold R, Zhang F . Use of interrupted time series analysis in evaluating health care quality improvements. Acad Pediatr. 2013; 13(6 Suppl):S38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.08.002. View

19.

Bailey C, Blake C, Schriver M, Cubaka V, Thomas T, Martin Hilber A . A systematic review of supportive supervision as a strategy to improve primary healthcare services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 132(1):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.004. View

20.

Sourial N, Longo C, Vedel I, Schuster T . Daring to draw causal claims from non-randomized studies of primary care interventions. Fam Pract. 2018; 35(5):639-643. PMC: 6142715. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmy005. View