» Articles » PMID: 39740341

Sports Participation & Childhood Neurocognitive Development

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2024 Dec 31
PMID 39740341
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various psychosocial factors like collaboration inherent to team sports might provide a more dynamic environment for cognitive challenges that could foster enhanced neurocognitive development compared to individual sports. We investigated the impact of different organised sports on neurocognitive development in children (N = 11,878; aged 9-11) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Participants were classified into four categories based on their sports involvement at baseline and two years later: none, individual-based, team-based, or both. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted on 11 cognitive tests and neuroimaging metrics (i.e., resting-state functional connectivity and various grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) measurements) between sport groups. A comparison between team and individual sports yielded no significant differences in cognitive measures at baseline and follow-up. Similarly, although WM microstructural differences were significant, the effect size was small. However, participation in any sport at baseline was associated with superior performance in various cognitive domains (i.e. inhibition, processing speed, and others), greater subcortical GM volume (i.e. cerebellum cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, and others), and whole-brain WM integrity compared to non-participants. Results suggest a positive association between organised sports participation, specifically individual and team-based sports, and neurocognitive development. However, further investigation is warranted to determine the nuanced effects of different sports on neurocognitive development.

References
1.
Schmithorst V, Wilke M, Dardzinski B, Holland S . Cognitive functions correlate with white matter architecture in a normal pediatric population: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005; 26(2):139-47. PMC: 1859842. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20149. View

2.
Hallquist M, Hwang K, Luna B . The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 82:208-25. PMC: 3759585. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116. View

3.
Krafft C, Pierce J, Schwarz N, Chi L, Weinberger A, Schaeffer D . An eight month randomized controlled exercise intervention alters resting state synchrony in overweight children. Neuroscience. 2013; 256:445-55. PMC: 3995346. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.09.052. View

4.
Gordon E, Laumann T, Adeyemo B, Huckins J, Kelley W, Petersen S . Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. Cereb Cortex. 2014; 26(1):288-303. PMC: 4677978. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu239. View

5.
Casey B, Tottenham N, Liston C, Durston S . Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(3):104-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.011. View