Gender/Sex Preferences May Moderate the Relationship Between Cohabitation and Sibling Incest

Overview

Journal Arch Sex Behav

Specialties Psychiatry
Social Sciences

Date 2024 Dec 31

PMID 39739180

Authors

Kelly M Babchishin

Emma J Holmes

Rainer Banse

Michael C Seto

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The current study examined the extent to which gender/sex preference moderated the role of cohabitation on incest avoidance in an online sample of 1,623 adults with at least one opposite-sex sibling. Consistent with previous research, we found that longer cohabitation with a sibling was associated with decreased sexual interest in sexual contact between hypothetical siblings. We extended the literature by finding that gender/sex preferences contribute significantly to our understanding of incest avoidance. Among female participants, we found that higher attraction to males was correlated with greater disgust toward hypothetical sibling incest, diminished sexual interest in hypothetical sibling incest, and fewer reports of sexual contact with their siblings. Among male participants, gender/sex preferences significantly moderated the relationship between cohabitation and reported sibling sexual contact. Males with higher attraction to females who had shorter cohabitation reported more sibling sexual contact compared to those with longer cohabitation; in contrast, males with higher attraction to males reported similar levels of sexual contact with siblings regardless of cohabitation length. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering gender/sex preferences to better understand the mechanisms underlying sibling incest.

References

Antfolk J, Lieberman D, Santtila P . Fitness costs predict inbreeding aversion irrespective of self-involvement: support for hypotheses derived from evolutionary theory. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e50613. PMC: 3509093. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050613. View

Babchishin K, Holmes E, Banse R, Huppertz L, Seto M . Characteristics and risk factors for sibling incest. PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314550. PMC: 11614286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314550. View

Chivers M . The Specificity of Women's Sexual Response and Its Relationship with Sexual Orientations: A Review and Ten Hypotheses. Arch Sex Behav. 2017; 46(5):1161-1179. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x. View

Cumming G, Finch S . Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol. 2005; 60(2):170-80. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170. View

Deering R, Mellor D . An exploratory qualitative study of the self-reported impact of female-perpetrated childhood sexual abuse. J Child Sex Abus. 2011; 20(1):58-76. DOI: 10.1080/10538712.2011.539964. View

Elkovitch N, Latzman R, Hansen D, Flood M . Understanding child sexual behavior problems: a developmental psychopathology framework. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009; 29(7):586-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.006. View

Eriksen S, Jensen V . A push or a punch: distinguishing the severity of sibling violence. J Interpers Violence. 2008; 24(1):183-208. DOI: 10.1177/0886260508316298. View

Finkelhor D . Sex among siblings: a survey on prevalence, variety, and effects. Arch Sex Behav. 1980; 9(3):171-94. DOI: 10.1007/BF01542244. View

Finkelhor D . Victimization of children. Am Psychol. 1994; 49(3):173-83. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.49.3.173. View

10.

Greenwald E, Leitenberg H . Long-term effects of sexual experiences with siblings and nonsiblings during childhood. Arch Sex Behav. 1989; 18(5):389-99. DOI: 10.1007/BF01541971. View

11.

Griffee K, Swindell S, OKeefe S, Stroebel S, Beard K, Kuo S . Etiological Risk Factors for Sibling Incest: Data From an Anonymous Computer-Assisted Self-Interview. Sex Abuse. 2014; 28(7):620-59. DOI: 10.1177/1079063214558941. View

12.

Kellogg N . Clinical report--the evaluation of sexual behaviors in children. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(3):992-8. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-1692. View

13.

Koenig W, Haydock J, Stanback M . Reproductive roles in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: incest avoidance versus reproductive competition. Am Nat. 2008; 151(3):243-55. DOI: 10.1086/286115. View

14.

Krienert J, Walsh J . Sibling sexual abuse: an empirical analysis of offender, victim, and event characteristics in National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data, 2000-2007. J Child Sex Abus. 2011; 20(4):353-72. DOI: 10.1080/10538712.2011.588190. View

15.

Larsson I, Svedin C . Sexual experiences in childhood: young adults' recollections. Arch Sex Behav. 2002; 31(3):263-73. DOI: 10.1023/a:1015252903931. View

16.

Lieberman D, Tooby J, Cosmides L . The architecture of human kin detection. Nature. 2007; 445(7129):727-31. PMC: 3581061. DOI: 10.1038/nature05510. View

17.

Mustanski B, Dupree M, Nievergelt C, Bocklandt S, Schork N, Hamer D . A genomewide scan of male sexual orientation. Hum Genet. 2005; 116(4):272-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00439-004-1241-4. View

18.

Seemanova E . A study of children of incestuous matings. Hum Hered. 1971; 21(2):108-28. DOI: 10.1159/000152391. View

19.

Shepher J . Mate selection among second generation kibbutz adolescents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Arch Sex Behav. 2013; 1(4):293-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF01638058. View

20.

Stoltenborgh M, van IJzendoorn M, Euser E, Bakermans-Kranenburg M . A global perspective on child sexual abuse: meta-analysis of prevalence around the world. Child Maltreat. 2011; 16(2):79-101. DOI: 10.1177/1077559511403920. View