» Articles » PMID: 39738867

The CASE of Brand Names During Sentence Reading

Overview
Journal Psychol Res
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Dec 31
PMID 39738867
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brand names typically maintain a distinctive letter case (e.g., IKEA, Google). This element is essential for theoretical (word recognition models) and practical (brand design) reasons. In abstractionist models, letter case is considered irrelevant, whereas instance-based models use surface information like letter case during lexical retrieval. Previous brand identification tasks reported faster responses to brands in their characteristic letter case (e.g., IKEA and Google faster than ikea and GOOGLE), favoring instance-based models. We examined whether this pattern can be generalized to normal sentence reading: Participants read sentences in which well-known brand names were presented intact (e.g., IKEA, Google) or with a modified letter case (e.g., Ikea, GOOGLE). Results showed a cost for brands written in uppercase, independently of their characteristic letter case, in early eye fixation measures (probability of first-fixation, first-fixation duration). However, for later measures (gaze duration and total times), fixation times were longer when the brand's letter case was modified, restricted to those brands typically written in lowercase (e.g., GOOGLE > Google, whereas Ikea ≲ IKEA). Thus, during sentence reading, both the actual letter case and the typical letter case of brand names interact dynamically, posing problems for abstractionist models of reading.

References
1.
Ans B, Carbonnel S, Valdois S . A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychol Rev. 1998; 105(4):678-723. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.678-723. View

2.
Brysbaert M, Stevens M . Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. J Cogn. 2019; 1(1):9. PMC: 6646942. DOI: 10.5334/joc.10. View

3.
Cohen L, Lehericy S, Chochon F, Lemer C, Rivaud S, Dehaene S . Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 5):1054-69. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf094. View

4.
Cutter M, Martin A, Sturt P . Capitalization interacts with syntactic complexity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019; 46(6):1146-1164. DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000780. View

5.
Dehaene S, Cohen L, Sigman M, Vinckier F . The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9(7):335-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004. View