» Articles » PMID: 39738145

Prognostic Role of Aetiological Agent Vs. Clinical Pattern in Candidates to Lead Extraction for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Dec 31
PMID 39738145
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices infections (CIEDI) are associated with poor survival despite the improvement in transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Aetiology and systemic involvement are driving factors of clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore their contribute on overall mortality. A prospective study was performed between 2011 and 2021, including all TLE candidates at our regional referral University hospital for CIEDI with microbiological confirmed aetiology. Considering significant predictors of mortality at multivariate Cox regression analyses, a 5-point BOPD score was developed, and it was validated with a prospective cohort from the Padua University. 157 patients were enrolled (mean age 71.3 ± 12.3 years, 81.5% male). S. aureus was isolated in 32.5% of patients, and it was more associated with valvular heart disease, systemic infection, and chronic kidney disease. CIEDI pattern was associated with 1-year mortality, with a significantly worse outcome in patients with "cold closed pocket" (CCP). The developed BOPD score presented a 0.807 AUC (95%CI 0.703-0.910, p < 0.001) and a good predictive value (OR 2.355, 95%CI 1.754-3.162; p < 0.001), and was associated with a progressive increase in mortality with a score > 2. The score validation with the registry from the Padua University (135 patients) retrieved a C-statistic of 0.746 (95%CI 0.613-0.879; p = 0.002). Both CCP and S. aureus were confirmed as risk factors for mortality in CIEDI patients. This study supports the hypothesis that the infectious process may occur through different mechanisms associated with different infection patterns, and high-risk patients should be considered for specific and aggressive approaches.

References
1.
Tarakji K, Chan E, Cantillon D, Doonan A, Hu T, Schmitt S . Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: presentation, management, and patient outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7(8):1043-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.016. View

2.
Diemberger I, Migliore F, Biffi M, Cipriani A, Bertaglia E, Lorenzetti S . The "Subtle" connection between development of cardiac implantable electrical device infection and survival after complete system removal: An observational prospective multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. 2017; 250:146-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.061. View

3.
Rodriguez D, Afzal A, Evonich R, Haines D . The prevalence of methicillin resistant organisms among pacemaker and defibrillator implant recipients. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2012; 2(2):116-22. PMC: 3371624. View

4.
Kutarski A, Jachec W, Tulecki L, Czajkowski M, Nowosielecka D, Stefanczyk P . Disparities in transvenous lead extraction in young adults. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9601. PMC: 9187694. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13769-y. View

5.
Polewczyk A, Jachec W, Segreti L, Bongiorni M, Kutarski A . Influence of the type of pathogen on the clinical course of infectious complications related to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14864. PMC: 8295258. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94168-7. View