» Articles » PMID: 39737542

Phase 3 Study of Talazoparib Plus Enzalutamide Versus Placebo Plus Enzalutamide As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: TALAPRO-2 Japanese Subgroup Analysis

Abstract

Background: In TALAPRO-2, the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib plus the androgen receptor-signaling inhibitor enzalutamide improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus placebo plus enzalutamide (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78) in molecularly unselected patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We report an exploratory analysis of efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients enrolled in the TALAPRO-2 study.

Methods: The ongoing, multinational, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study enrolled patients with mCRPC receiving ongoing androgen deprivation therapy. Patients were prospectively assessed for homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations and randomized 1:1 to receive talazoparib or placebo plus enzalutamide once daily. The primary endpoint was rPFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

Results: For the 116 Japanese all-comers patients enrolled in TALAPRO-2, the HR for rPFS was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.45-1.75) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm; among those with HRR-deficient disease, the HR was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.16-2.20). Among patients with BRCA1/2 gene alterations in the HRR-deficient population (n = 10), the HR for rPFS was < 0.01 (95% CI, < 0.01-not reached) for the talazoparib versus placebo arm. In the all-comers population, the objective response rate by BICR was 55% (all complete responses) in the talazoparib arm versus 36% in the placebo arm. The safety profile of talazoparib plus enzalutamide was similar between Japanese patients and the overall all-comers population; no new safety signals were identified. Anemia was the most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (55%) and cause of talazoparib discontinuation (12%). Talazoparib C was comparable across Japanese, Asian, and non-Asian subgroups.

Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, efficacy outcomes with talazoparib plus enzalutamide in Japanese patients in TALAPRO-2 were consistent with those in the overall all-comers population. The safety profile and pharmacokinetics of the combination were similar between Japanese patients and the overall all-comers population.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03395197.

References
1.
Goebell P, Raina R, Chen S, Rege S, Shah R, Grossman J . Real-world treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in the USA, Europe and Asia. Future Oncol. 2024; 20(14):903-918. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0814. View

2.
Murai J, Huang S, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Ji J, Takeda S . Stereospecific PARP trapping by BMN 673 and comparison with olaparib and rucaparib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013; 13(2):433-43. PMC: 3946062. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0803. View

3.
Matsumura N, Mandai M . PMDA regulatory update on approval of new drugs and revisions of precautions; approval of talazoparib tosilate for prostate and breast cancer, and luspatercept for myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 29(5):493-494. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02510-6. View

4.
Mirzaei S, Paskeh M, Okina E, Gholami M, Hushmandi K, Hashemi M . Molecular Landscape of LncRNAs in Prostate Cancer: A focus on pathways and therapeutic targets for intervention. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 41(1):214. PMC: 9248128. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02406-1. View

5.
ODonnell P, Dolan M . Cancer pharmacoethnicity: ethnic differences in susceptibility to the effects of chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(15):4806-14. PMC: 2774468. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0344. View