» Articles » PMID: 39737191

Impact of Steroid-sparing Immunosuppressive Agents on Tumor Outcome in the Context of Cancer Immunotherapy with Highlight on Melanoma: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background: The impact of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents (SSIAs) for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on tumor outcome is not well-known. This systematic review evaluates tumor outcomes for corticosteroid (CS) monotherapy versus CS with SSIA (CS-SSIA) for irAE treatment with a focus on melanoma.

Methods: Search was conducted through 1/5/23 using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. We included case series, retrospective/prospective observational studies and interventional clinical trials. Individual-level data was analyzed using KM curves and Cox regression for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Time to SSIA was treated as a time-varying exposure using landmark analysis (landmark timepoint=3 months after irAE) to account for immortal time bias. For group-level data, meta-analysis compared the use of SSIA to No SSIA for irAEs.

Results: Of twenty-two publications with individual-level data, 147 patients with any cancer (57 CS, 90 CS-SSIA) and 65 with melanoma (18 CS, 47 CS-SSIA) underwent landmark analysis. Twenty-two publications underwent group-level evaluation and four were included in the meta-analysis. CS-SSIA versus CS showed higher risk of all-cause mortality and progression (HR 2.75, 95%CI: 1.44-5.27, p<0.01 and HR 1.75, 95%CI: 1.07-2.85, p=0.03, respectively). Melanoma showed worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus CS (HR 5.68, 95%CI: 1.31-24.67, p=0.02 and HR 2.68, 95%CI: 1.12-6.40, p=0.03, respectively). In the meta-analysis of group-level data (n=2558), we found worse OS and PFS for CS-SSIA versus No SSIA (HR 1.58, 95%CI: 1.25; 2.01, p<0.01 and 1.70, 95%CI: 1.25-2.33, p<0.01). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) were the most common SSIA. In the melanoma cohort, TNFi had worse OS and PFS versus CS (HR 6.46, 95%CI: 1.43-29.19, p = 0.02 and HR 7.49, 95%CI: 2.29-24.48, p<0.01, respectively). TNFi versus Other SSIAs showed a trend toward worse OS and worse PFS (HR 6.96, 95%CI: 0.90-53.65, p=0.06 and HR 21.5, 95%CI: 2.63-175.8, p<0.01, respectively). Meta-analysis showed a concern for TNFi compared to Other SSIA (HR 1.56, 95%CI: 1.17-2.09, p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusions: While our results raise concern about the effects of CS-SSIA and TNFi for irAE therapy on tumor outcomes, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively assess the effect of SSIAs on tumor outcomes.

References
1.
Dearden H, Au L, Wang D, Zimmer L, Eroglu Z, Smith J . Hyperacute toxicity with combination ipilimumab and anti-PD1 immunotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 153:168-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.045. View

2.
Larkin J, Chmielowski B, Lao C, Hodi F, Sharfman W, Weber J . Neurologic Serious Adverse Events Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Advanced Melanoma, Including a Case Series of Encephalitis. Oncologist. 2017; 22(6):709-718. PMC: 5469590. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0487. View

3.
van Not O, Verheijden R, van den Eertwegh A, Haanen J, Aarts M, van den Berkmortel F . Association of Immune-Related Adverse Event Management With Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(12):1794-1801. PMC: 9614679. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5041. View

4.
Kfoury M, Najean M, Lappara A, Voisin A, Champiat S, Michot J . Analysis of the association between prospectively collected immune-related adverse events and survival in patients with solid tumor treated with immune-checkpoint blockers, taking into account immortal-time bias. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022; 110:102452. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102452. View

5.
Cantini L, Paoloni F, Pecci F, Spagnolo F, Genova C, Tanda E . Safety of extended interval dosing immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 115(7):796-804. PMC: 10323889. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad061. View