» Articles » PMID: 39734741

The in Vitro Activity of Omadacycline Alone and in Combination Against Carbapenem-Resistant

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2024 Dec 30
PMID 39734741
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of omadacycline (OMC) and OMC-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant (CRKP).

Methods: The broth microdilution assay assessed the in vitro susceptibility of CRKP to OMC. The checkerboard assay was performed to evaluate the activity of OMC combined with polymyxin B (PB), amikacin (AN), or meropenem (MEM) against KPC-producing (class A) CRKP strains, and OMC combined with PB, aztreonam (ATM), MEM, or AN against class B and class A plus class B CRKP strains. Synergistic effects of OMC and PB were further evaluated by time-kill assays in the KPC-producing CRKP strains.

Results: Broth microdilution assays revealed a notable variation in susceptibility between KPC-producing and class B CRKP strains, with MIC50/90 of 32/32 mg/L and 0.5/8 mg/L, respectively. Although KPC-producing CRKP strains were resistant to OMC, a synergistic effect was observed in 37.5% of KPC-producing CRKP strains when OMC was combined with PB. In the nine KPC-producing CRKP strains, time-kill assays found that cell densities of six strains (66.7%) decreased by 3.61 ± 0.23 log CFU/mL compared to the initial inoculum after 2 hours of PB exposure. The cell densities further decreased by an average of 2.38 ± 0.23 log CFU/mL when the six strains were exposed to OMC plus PB, confirming their potent synergism.

Conclusion: OMC monotherapy is ineffective against KPC-producing CRKP strains, but OMC plus PB has a potent synergistic effect on them, suggesting that OMC plus PB is the preferred combination therapy against KPC-producing CRKP in vitro.

References
1.
Watkins R, Deresinski S . Omadacycline: A Novel Tetracycline Derivative With Oral and Intravenous Formulations. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 69(5):890-896. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz242. View

2.
. EUCAST Definitive Document E.Def 1.2, May 2000: Terminology relating to methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001; 6(9):503-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00149.x. View

3.
Mirza H, Uskudar Guclu A, Ince Ceviz G, Basustaoglu A . Comparative activities of omadacycline, eravacycline and tigecycline against non-ESBL-producing, ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant isolates of . J Med Microbiol. 2022; 71(10). DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001592. View

4.
Abd El-Aziz Gadallah M, El-Sayed W, Hussien M, Elheniedy M, Maxwell S . In-vitro activity of plazomicin, meropenem-vaborbactam, and omadacycline against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative isolates in Egypt. J Chemother. 2022; 35(3):205-218. DOI: 10.1080/1120009X.2022.2095156. View

5.
Tamma P, Aitken S, Bonomo R, Mathers A, van Duin D, Clancy C . Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance.... Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 75(2):187-212. PMC: 9890506. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac268. View