» Articles » PMID: 39734066

Validation of the Korean Version of Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale for Assessment of Postoperative Pain: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Korean J Pain
Date 2024 Dec 29
PMID 39734066
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The defense and veterans pain rating scale (DVPRS) is a pain assessment tool combining a numerical rating scale (NRS) with descriptive words, colors, and facial expressions. This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the DVPRS (K-DVPRS) for postoperative pain assessment.

Methods: This study included patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery. The original DVPRS was translated into Korean using a forward-backward method. Pain intensities at rest and during coughing were assessed at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively using the NRS and K-DVPRS, respectively. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire was also used. The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the K-DVPRS were evaluated.

Results: Of the 174 patients screened, 150 were enrolled, and 148 completed the study. The K-DVPRS had strong convergent validity with the NRS at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (ρ: 0.75 to 0.78, all < 0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by significant differences in pain scores based on surgical extent and duration. The internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.77 and 0.85 at 24 and 48 hours, respectively), and test-retest reliability at 24 hours was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.90 at rest and 0.95 during coughing). Responsiveness, measured by Cliff's effect size, was high from preoperative to 24 hours postoperatively and moderate from 24 to 48 hours. At 48 hours, the K-DVPRS had stronger correlations with the EQ-5D-5L index and EQVAS than with the NRS.

Conclusions: The K-DVPRS is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for assessing postoperative pain in Korean patients.

References
1.
Gerbershagen H, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Aduckathil S, Peelen L, Kappen T, van Wijck A . Procedure-specific risk factor analysis for the development of severe postoperative pain. Anesthesiology. 2013; 120(5):1237-45. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000108. View

2.
Choi S, Yoon S, Lee H . Beyond measurement: a deep dive into the commonly used pain scales for postoperative pain assessment. Korean J Pain. 2024; 37(3):188-200. PMC: 11220383. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.24069. View

3.
Gorsky K, Black N, Niazi A, Saripella A, Englesakis M, Leroux T . Psychological interventions to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption: a narrative review of literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 46(10):893-903. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102434. View

4.
Holder C, Schenker M, Baker J, Giordano N . Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale scores associated with longer PROMIS measures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2022; 49(6):461-463. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104010. View

5.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D . Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011; 20(10):1727-36. PMC: 3220807. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. View