» Articles » PMID: 39733104

Exploring Potential Multiple Molecular Biomarkers That Predict Treatment Response in Patients with Lupus Nephritis

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Dec 29
PMID 39733104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limited knowledge exists regarding biomarkers that predict treatment response in Lupus nephritis (LN). We aimed to identify potential molecular biomarkers to predict treatment response in patients with LN. We enrolled 66 patients with active LN who underwent renal biopsy upon enrollment. Serum and urine samples were collected longitudinally, and we measured 12 biomarkers in each sample using a multiplex immunofluorescence assay. These biomarkers included monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 16 (IL-16), interleukin 17 (IL-17), interleukin 23 (IL-23), tumor necrosis factor receptor II (TNF-RII), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP 4), vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Patients were categorized into two groups based on their 1-year treatment response to Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based therapy: 50 responders and 16 non-responders. Only urine IL-17 (uIL-17) showed baseline level differences between the two groups, with higher in responders. In ROC curve analyses assessing the predictive performance of biomarkers, baseline uIL-17 and changes in uIL-6 and uIL-23 levels at 3 months could predict the 1-year treatment response, showing AUC values of 0.70 (95% CI 0.54-0.87), 0.70 (0.54-0.86), and 0.71 (0.57-0.85), respectively. Combining uIL-6 and uIL-23 into a model improved predictability, achieving an AUC of 0.75 (0.61-0.90). Baseline uIL-17 levels and early changes in uIL-6 and uIL-23 could serve as potential biomarkers to predict 1-year treatment response in lupus nephritis patients receiving MMF-based therapy.

References
1.
Appel G, Contreras G, Dooley M, Ginzler E, Isenberg D, Jayne D . Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20(5):1103-12. PMC: 2678035. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008101028. View

2.
Satirapoj B, Kitiyakara C, Leelahavanichkul A, Avihingsanon Y, Supasyndh O . Urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin to predict renal response after induction therapy in active lupus nephritis. BMC Nephrol. 2017; 18(1):263. PMC: 5545009. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0678-3. View

3.
Wong C, Lit L, Shan Tam L, Li E, Wong P, Kei Lam C . Hyperproduction of IL-23 and IL-17 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for Th17-mediated inflammation in auto-immunity. Clin Immunol. 2008; 127(3):385-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2008.01.019. View

4.
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Cheema K, Anders H, Aringer M, Bajema I . 2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79(6):713-723. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-216924. View

5.
Schinocca C, Rizzo C, Fasano S, Grasso G, Barbera L, Ciccia F . Role of the IL-23/IL-17 Pathway in Rheumatic Diseases: An Overview. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:637829. PMC: 7937623. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637829. View