Quality of Care at Childbirth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Belgium: a Cross-sectional Study Based on WHO Standards

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Dec 28

PMID 39732493

Authors

Anna Galle

Helga Berghman

Silke DHauwers

Nele Vaerewijck

Emanuelle Pessa Valente

Ilaria Mariani

Arianna Bomben

Stefano Delle Vedove

Marzia Lazzerini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Data of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO region study in Belgium.

Participants: Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from 1 March 2020 to 1 May 2023 responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources and organisational changes related to COVID-19.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test.

Results: 897 women were included in the analysis, 67% (n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3% (n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth (IVB) and 19.7% (n=177) with caesarean section. We found overall high QMNC scores (median index scores>75) but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0% (n=166) of women who experienced labour reported inadequate pain relief, 64.7% (n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1% (n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9% (n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5% (n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1% (n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). Multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an IVB (-20.4 in the 50th percentile with p<0.001 and 95% CI (-25.2 to -15.5)). Over time, there was a significant increase in QMNC Score for 'experience of care' and 'key organisational changes due to COVID-19' (trend test p< 0.05).

Conclusions And Relevance: Our study showed several gaps in QMNC in Belgium, underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.

Trial Registration Number: NCT04847336.

References

Sjetne I, Veenstra M, Stavem K . The effect of hospital size and teaching status on patient experiences with hospital care: a multilevel analysis. Med Care. 2007; 45(3):252-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000252162.78915.62. View

Lazzerini M, Argentini G, Mariani I, Covi B, Semenzato C, Lincetto O . WHO standards-based tool to measure women's views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(2):e048195. PMC: 8852667. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048195. View

Kuipers Y, Bock V, Van de Craen N, Bosmans V . 'Naming and faming' maternity care providers: A mixed-methods study. Midwifery. 2023; 130:103912. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103912. View

Lenharo M . WHO declares end to COVID-19's emergency phase. Nature. 2023; . DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-01559-z. View

Deherder E, Delbaere I, Macedo A, Nieuwenhuijze M, Van Laere S, Beeckman K . Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):551. PMC: 9264300. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04890-x. View

Olde Loohuis K, de Kok B, Bruner W, Jonker A, Salia E, Tuncalp O . Strategies to improve interpersonal communication along the continuum of maternal and newborn care: A scoping review and narrative synthesis. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(10):e0002449. PMC: 10566738. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002449. View

Flaherty S, Delaney H, Matvienko-Sikar K, Smith V . Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's and maternity care providers' views and experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):438. PMC: 9132752. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04724-w. View

Christiaens W, Gouwy A, Bracke P . Does a referral from home to hospital affect satisfaction with childbirth? A cross-national comparison. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007; 7:109. PMC: 1939703. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-109. View

Wright A, Nassar A, Visser G, Ramasauskaite D, Theron G . FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 152(2):172-181. PMC: 7898872. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13552. View

10.

Depla A, Ruiter M, Laureij L, Ernst-Smelt H, Hazelzet J, Franx A . Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Perinatal Care to Guide Clinical Practice: Prospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(7):e37725. PMC: 9297146. DOI: 10.2196/37725. View

11.

Semaan A, Dey T, Kikula A, Asefa A, Delvaux T, Langlois E . "Separated during the first hours"-Postnatal care for women and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods cross-sectional study from a global online survey of maternal and newborn healthcare providers. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(4):e0000214. PMC: 10022345. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000214. View

12.

Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg I . Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022; 13:100268. PMC: 8703114. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268. View

13.

Seijmonsbergen-Schermers A, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, Beeckman K, Bogaerts A, Binfa L . Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2020; 17(5):e1003103. PMC: 7244098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003103. View

14.

Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

15.

Asefa A, Semaan A, Delvaux T, Huysmans E, Galle A, Sacks E . The impact of COVID-19 on the provision of respectful maternity care: Findings from a global survey of health workers. Women Birth. 2021; 35(4):378-386. PMC: 9179099. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.09.003. View

16.

Lalor J, Ayers S, Celleja Agius J, Downe S, Gouni O, Hartmann K . Balancing restrictions and access to maternity care for women and birthing partners during the COVID-19 pandemic: the psychosocial impact of suboptimal care. BJOG. 2021; 128(11):1720-1725. PMC: 8441715. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16844. View

17.

Galle A, Semaan A, Huysmans E, Audet C, Asefa A, Delvaux T . A double-edged sword-telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed-methods study of healthcare providers. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(2). PMC: 7908054. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004575. View

18.

Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Townsend R, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I . Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9(6):e759-e772. PMC: 8012052. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00079-6. View

19.

Townsend R, Chmielewska B, Barratt I, Kalafat E, van der Meulen J, Gurol-Urganci I . Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 37:100947. PMC: 8233134. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100947. View

20.

Cuellar A, Gertler P . How the expansion of hospital systems has affected consumers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24(1):213-9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.213. View