» Articles » PMID: 39732480

Monitoring Low-value Care in Medical Patients from Swiss University Hospitals Using a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) National Data Stream and Patient and Public Involvement: LUCID Study Protocol

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare practices providing minimal or no benefit to recipients have been estimated to represent 20% of healthcare costs. However, defining, measuring and monitoring low-value care (LVC) and its downstream consequences remain a major challenge. The purpose of the National Data Stream (LUCID NDS) is to identify and monitor LVC in medical inpatients using routinely collected hospital data.

Methods And Analysis: This protocol describes a multistep approach to the identification and surveillance of LVC: (1) creating an NDS based on Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles using routinely collected hospital data from medical inpatients who signed a general consent for data reuse from 2014 onwards; (2) selecting recommendations applicable to medical inpatients using data from LUCID NDS to develop a comprehensive and robust set of LVC indicators; (3) establishing expert consensus on the most relevant and actionable recommendations to prevent LVC; (4) applying the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy methodology to assess the level of evidence of recommendations; (5) involving patients and the public at various stages of LUCID NDS; and (6) designing monitoring rules within the LUCID NDS and validating quality measures.

Ethics And Dissemination: The ethics committees of all five participating university hospitals (Basel, Bern, Geneva, Lausanne and Zurich) approved LUCID NDS as a national registry on quality of care. We will disseminate our findings in peer-reviewed journals, at professional conferences, and through short reports sent to participating entities and stakeholders; moreover, lay summaries are provided for patients and the broader public on our webpage (www.LUCID-nds.ch).

References
1.
Sypes E, de Grood C, Clement F, Parsons Leigh J, Whalen-Browne L, Stelfox H . Understanding the public's role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):20. PMC: 7137456. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-00986-0. View

2.
McGuckin T, Crick K, Myroniuk T, Setchell B, Yeung R, Campbell-Scherer D . Understanding challenges of using routinely collected health data to address clinical care gaps: a case study in Alberta, Canada. BMJ Open Qual. 2022; 11(1). PMC: 8744094. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001491. View

3.
Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B . Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2017; 27(1):7-22. PMC: 6680214. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3564. View

4.
Sipila R, Makela M, Komulainen J . Highlighting the need for de-implementation - Choosing Wisely recommendations based on clinical practice guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):638. PMC: 6729023. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4460-z. View

5.
Cliff B, Avancena A, Hirth R, Lee S . The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review. Milbank Q. 2021; 99(4):1024-1058. PMC: 8718584. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12531. View