» Articles » PMID: 39731623

Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors Vs. Docetaxel Chemotherapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive and First-line Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2024 Dec 28
PMID 39731623
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: No currently available phase III trial compared docetaxel vs. androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) regarding cancer-control outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Moreover, few is known about the effect of sequential therapies in mHSPC and subsequent metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Methods: We relied on the FRAMCAP database and compared docetaxel vs. ARPI in mHSPC patients regarding time to mCRPC (ttCRPC) and overall survival (OS). Sensitivity analyses addressed high volume mHSPC patients. Finally, sequential therapies were compared regarding progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in first-line mCRPC.

Results: Of 419 included mHSPC patients, 25% received docetaxel vs. 75% ARPI. ARPI patients were significantly older (71 vs. 66 years), and harbored lower baseline PSA (38 vs. 183 ng/ml, both p ≤ 0.002). Median ttCRPC was significantly longer for ARPI than for docetaxel-treated patients (30 vs. 17 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49, p < 0.001). In OS analyses, ARPI patients also exhibited significantly longer OS, relative to docetaxel patients (96 vs. 50 months, HR: 0.67, p = 0.03). After multivariable adjustment in Cox regression models, no difference between both treatments remained in both analyses (all p > 0.05). In sensitivity analyses of high volume mHSPC patients only, also no ttCRPC or OS differences were observed for ARPI vs. docetaxel (all p > 0.05). Regarding sequential therapies, no PFS and OS differences were observed for all and specifically high volume mHSPC patients, when ARPI-ARPI vs. ARPI-docetaxel vs. docetaxel-ARPI treatments were compared (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: In real-world setting, ARPI treatment performs comparable to docetaxel chemotherapy in mHSPC. Therefore, docetaxel should only be used in triplet therapy. Moreover, no differences for sequential therapies of ARPI/docetaxel combinations in first-line mCRPC were observed.

References
1.
Lam B, Tsang V, Lee M, Chan K, Liu T, Ng B . A territory-wide real-world efficacy and toxicity analysis of abiraterone acetate versus docetaxel in 574 Asian patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023; 22(1):e75-e85.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.07.012. View

2.
Ozaki K, Hatakeyama S, Narita S, Hata K, Yanagisawa T, Tanaka T . Comparison of efficacy and medical costs between upfront docetaxel and abiraterone treatments of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients in real-world practice: a multicenter retrospective study. World J Urol. 2022; 41(1):67-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04237-3. View

3.
Armstrong A, Szmulewitz R, Petrylak D, Holzbeierlein J, Villers A, Azad A . ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(32):2974-2986. PMC: 6839905. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00799. View

4.
Sydes M, Spears M, Mason M, Clarke N, Dearnaley D, de Bono J . Adding abiraterone or docetaxel to long-term hormone therapy for prostate cancer: directly randomised data from the STAMPEDE multi-arm, multi-stage platform protocol. Ann Oncol. 2018; 29(5):1235-1248. PMC: 5961425. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy072. View

5.
Wenzel M, Siech C, Hoeh B, Koll F, Humke C, Tilki D . Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Oncological Outcomes of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer and First- to Sixth- line Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 66:46-54. PMC: 11260326. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.010. View