» Articles » PMID: 39728626

Evaluation of Protocols for DNA Extraction from Individual to Assess Pyrethroid Resistance Using Genotyping Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Overview
Journal Methods Protoc
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Dec 27
PMID 39728626
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

is a major vector of pathogens, including West Nile and Usutu viruses, that poses a significant public health risk. Monitoring pyrethroid resistance in mosquito populations is essential for effective vector control. This study aims to evaluate four DNA extraction protocols-QIAsymphony, DNAzol Direct reagent, PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (USPR), and Chelex 100-to identify an optimal method to extract DNA from individual , as part of a high-throughput surveillance of pyrethroid resistance using Real-Time Genotyping PCR. The target is the L1014F mutation in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel (VSSC) gene, which confers knockdown (kdr) resistance to pyrethroids. Mosquitoes were collected from wintering and summer habitats in Lazio and Tuscany, Italy, and DNA was extracted using the four methods. The quality, quantity, extraction time, and cost of the DNA were compared among the various methods. The PrepMan USPR protocol was the most efficient, providing high-quality DNA with a 260/280 purity ratio within the optimal range at the lowest cost and in a short time. This method also demonstrated the highest amplification success rate (77%) in subsequent real-time PCR assays, making it the preferred protocol for large-scale genotyping studies.

References
1.
Cantu C, Bucheli S, Houston R . Comparison of DNA extraction techniques for the recovery of bovine DNA from fly larvae crops. J Forensic Sci. 2022; 67(4):1651-1659. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15010. View

2.
Lucena-Aguilar G, Sanchez-Lopez A, Barberan-Aceituno C, Carrillo-Avila J, Lopez-Guerrero J, Aguilar-Quesada R . DNA Source Selection for Downstream Applications Based on DNA Quality Indicators Analysis. Biopreserv Biobank. 2016; 14(4):264-70. PMC: 4991598. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2015.0064. View

3.
Weissenbock H, Bakonyi T, Rossi G, Mani P, Nowotny N . Usutu virus, Italy, 1996. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013; 19(2):274-7. PMC: 3559058. DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.121191. View

4.
Scaramozzino P, Carvelli A, Bruni G, Cappiello G, Censi F, Magliano A . West Nile and Usutu viruses co-circulation in central Italy: outcomes of the 2018 integrated surveillance. Parasit Vectors. 2021; 14(1):243. PMC: 8103664. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04736-z. View

5.
Rider M, Byrd B, Keating J, Wesson D, Caillouet K . PCR detection of malaria parasites in desiccated Anopheles mosquitoes is uninhibited by storage time and temperature. Malar J. 2012; 11:193. PMC: 3405449. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-193. View