» Articles » PMID: 39727465

Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Restorations: Techniques Review and Proposal for Improvement

Overview
Journal Dent J (Basel)
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 Dec 27
PMID 39727465
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Full-arch zirconia restorations on implants have gained popularity due to zirconia's strength and aesthetics, yet they are still associated with challenges like structural fractures, peri-implant complications, and design misfits. Advances in CAD/CAM and digital workflows offer potential improvements, but a technique that consistently addresses these issues in fixed, full-arch, implant-supported prostheses is needed. This novel technique integrates a facially and prosthetically driven treatment approach, which is divided into three phases: data acquisition, restoration design, and manufacturing/delivery. Digital tools, including intraoral scanning and photogrammetry, facilitate accurate implant positioning, while 3D design software enables functional and aesthetic validation before final milling. A dual software approach is used to reverse engineer a titanium bar from the final restoration design, ensuring a superior outcome to other protocols. The restoration incorporates a zirconia-titanium hybrid structure, optimizing strength, flexibility, and weight. The proposed workflow enhances restoration precision and predictability through a prosthetically driven treatment plan, by ensuring passivity and aligning with biological and mechanical principles to promote long-term stability. By starting with the proposed restoration design and reverse engineering the bar, while also allowing for flexibility in material and component choices, this technique accommodates both patient needs and financial considerations. This approach demonstrates potential for improving patient outcomes in full-arch implant restorations by minimizing complications associated with traditional methods. Further research is recommended to validate the technique's efficacy and broaden its clinical applications.

References
1.
Delucchi F, De Giovanni E, Pesce P, Bagnasco F, Pera F, Baldi D . Framework Materials for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(12). PMC: 8231547. DOI: 10.3390/ma14123251. View

2.
Pelekanos S, Ntovas P, Rizou V, Pozzi A . Translucent monolithic zirconia titanium-supported FP1 full-arch prosthesis: A novel proof of concept to address esthetic, functional, and biologic challenges. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 36(1):197-206. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13167. View

3.
Stumpel L . A prefabricated modular substructure for a 4-implant-supported fixed complete denture: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124(6):637-641. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.025. View

4.
Villefort R, Tribst J, Dal Piva A, Borges A, Binda N, Ferreira C . Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator. PLoS One. 2020; 15(10):e0241589. PMC: 7598468. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241589. View

5.
Al-Rafee M . The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: A literature Review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020; 9(4):1841-1843. PMC: 7346915. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1181_19. View