» Articles » PMID: 39726731

Feasibility, Validity, and Normative Data for the Remote Uniform Data Set Neuropsychological Battery at the University of Pennsylvania Alzheimer's Disease Research Center

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the feasibility and validity of the remotely-administered neuropsychological battery from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set (UDS T-Cog).

Methods: Two hundred twenty Penn Alzheimer's Disease Research Center participants with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia completed the T-Cog during their annual UDS evaluation. We assessed administration feasibility and diagnostic group differences cross-sectionally across telephone versus videoconference modalities, and compared T-Cog to prior in-person UDS scores longitudinally.

Results: Administration time averaged 54 min and 79% of participants who initiated a T-Cog completed all 12 subtests; completion time and rates differed by diagnostic group but not by modality. Performance varied expectedly across groups with moderate to strong associations between most T-Cog measures and in-person correlates, although select subtests demonstrated lower comparability.

Discussion: The T-Cog is feasibly administered and shows preliminary validity in a cognitively heterogeneous cohort. Normative data from this cohort should be expanded to more diverse populations to enhance utility and generalizability.

Highlights: This study examined the feasibility and validity of the remote Uniform Data Set (also known as the T-Cog) and contributes key normative data for widespread use.A remote neuropsychological battery was feasibly administered with high overall engagement and completion rates, adequate reliability compared to in-person testing, and evidence of validity across diagnostic groups.Typical barriers to administration included hearing impairment, technology issues, and distractions; hearing difficulties were particularly common among cognitively impaired groups.Certain tests were less closely related to their in-person correlates and should be used with caution.

References
1.
Yochim B, Beaudreau S, Fairchild J, Yutsis M, Raymond N, Friedman L . Verbal naming test for use with older adults: development and initial validation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015; 21(3):239-48. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617715000120. View

2.
Pfeffer R, Kurosaki T, Harrah Jr C, Chance J, Filos S . Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982; 37(3):323-9. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323. View

3.
Ricker , Axelrod . Analysis of an Oral Paradigm for the Trail Making Test. Assessment. 1994; 1(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1177/1073191194001001007. View

4.
Parks A, Davis J, Spresser C, Stroescu I, Ecklund-Johnson E . Validity of In-Home Teleneuropsychological Testing in the Wake of COVID-19. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021; 36(6):887-896. PMC: 7929470. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acab002. View

5.
Koo T, Li M . A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2):155-63. PMC: 4913118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. View