» Articles » PMID: 39724487

Outcomes from 306 Consecutive Robotic Ventral Hernia Repairs in the Community Setting

Overview
Journal J Robot Surg
Publisher Springer
Date 2024 Dec 26
PMID 39724487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Robotic assisted laparoscopy is increasingly popular for primary ventral and incisional hernia repair. A variety of robotic techniques have been described. More data is needed to evaluate the indications and benefits of these approaches. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent robotic hernia repair over a 2-year period in the community setting. Techniques included: intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with fascial defect closure (IPOM +), ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair (vTAPP), and retrorectus (RR) repairs with or without transverse abdominis release (TAR). Follow up was obtained at minimum 6 months postoperatively. Outcomes data included complications, readmissions, reoperations, and hernia recurrences. This study included 306 consecutive robotic ventral hernia repairs: 63 IPOM + , 199 vTAPP, and 44 RR of which 25 (57%) required TAR. Average console times were similar between IPOM + and vTAPP groups (63 vs. 62 min, p = 0.71) and longer for RR repairs without vs. with TAR (107.8 vs. 184.4 min, p < 0.001). There were few intraoperative (0.6%) and immediate postoperative (0.3%) complications. Same day discharge was feasible in most patients (95%). Follow up was completed in 81.0% of patients with an average follow up time of 13.3 months (range 6-27 months). Rates of complications (1.3%), readmissions (1.0%), and reoperations (1.0%) were recorded. There were no hernia recurrences. Robotic ventral hernia repair is a safe and effective strategy for treatment of most abdominal wall hernias with low complication and recurrence rates in medium term follow up.

References
1.
Sugiyama G, Chivukula S, Chung P, Alfonso A . Robot-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair. JSLS. 2016; 19(4). PMC: 4756357. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00092. View

2.
Fuenmayor P, Lujan H, Plasencia G, Karmaker A, Mata W, Vecin N . Robotic-assisted ventral and incisional hernia repair with hernia defect closure and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) experience. J Robot Surg. 2020; 14(5):695-701. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01040-y. View

3.
DeAngelis N, Schena C, Moszkowicz D, Kuperas C, Fara R, Gaujoux S . Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2023; 38(1):24-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10545-5. View

4.
Penafiel J, Valladares G, Rodrigues A, Avelino P, Amorim L, Teixeira L . Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2023; 28(2):321-332. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02881-1. View

5.
Kudsi O, Gokcal F, Bou-Ayash N, Crawford A, Chung S, Chang K . Learning curve in robotic transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) ventral hernia repair: a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Hernia. 2020; 25(3):755-764. PMC: 7268975. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02228-0. View