» Articles » PMID: 39722833

Clinical Significance of Serum Bile Acid Profiles in Fatty Liver

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 26
PMID 39722833
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the alterations in serum bile acid profiles among individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and alcoholic fatty liver (AFL) and evaluate their clinical significance when combined with liver enzyme levels.

Methods: A cohort of 110 individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver 58 individuals and alcoholic fatty liver 52 individuals) was selected from the Department of Gastroenterology at Wenzhou People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022, while a control group of 66 healthy individuals was recruited from the hospital's health examination center during the same period. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from all participants. Serum bile acid profiles were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis was conducted in conjunction with liver enzyme indicators.

Results: In the NAFL group, GCA, TCA, and TCDCA levels were significantly elevated compared to the control group, with GCA (AUC 0.754, sensitivity 0.707, specificity 0.712), TCA (AUC 0.770, sensitivity 0.724, specificity 0.712), and TCDCA (AUC 0.782, sensitivity 0.810, specificity 0.652) showing strong diagnostic value. In the AFL group, TCDCA, TCA, GCA, TUDCA, and GUDCA were significantly elevated, with AUC values ranging from 0.848 to 0.912. Among these, TUDCA had the highest sensitivity (0.885) and specificity (0.773) for AFL diagnosis. TUDCA (sensitivity 0.615, specificity 0.897) was the key bile acid distinguishing AFL from NAFL, with an optimal cut-off of 36.33 nmol/L. These bile acids show significant diagnostic potential for differentiating NAFL and AFL.

Conclusion: The bile acid profiles in both NAFL and AFL patients show changes, which hold potential clinical significance and may serve as serum biomarkers to differentiate NAFL from AFL.

References
1.
Chiang J . Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr Physiol. 2013; 3(3):1191-212. PMC: 4422175. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c120023. View

2.
Jiao N, Baker S, Chapa-Rodriguez A, Liu W, Nugent C, Tsompana M . Suppressed hepatic bile acid signalling despite elevated production of primary and secondary bile acids in NAFLD. Gut. 2017; 67(10):1881-1891. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314307. View

3.
Safari Z, Gerard P . The links between the gut microbiome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019; 76(8):1541-1558. PMC: 11105223. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03011-w. View

4.
Wang Y, Chen W, Yu D, Forman B, Huang W . The G-protein-coupled bile acid receptor, Gpbar1 (TGR5), negatively regulates hepatic inflammatory response through antagonizing nuclear factor κ light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) in mice. Hepatology. 2011; 54(4):1421-32. PMC: 3184183. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24525. View

5.
Spatz M, Ciocan D, Merlen G, Rainteau D, Humbert L, Gomes-Rochette N . Bile acid-receptor TGR5 deficiency worsens liver injury in alcohol-fed mice by inducing intestinal microbiota dysbiosis. JHEP Rep. 2021; 3(2):100230. PMC: 7903352. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100230. View