» Articles » PMID: 39720186

Refractive Prediction Accuracy Using Intraoperative Aberrometry Versus Barrett True-K Formula Following Corneal Refractive Surgery

Overview
Journal Clin Ophthalmol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Dec 25
PMID 39720186
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the refractive prediction accuracy of the Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) SYSTEM with the Barrett True-K (BTK) formula in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that underwent cataract surgery after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients aged ≥22 years with prior myopic PRK or LASIK who underwent unilateral or bilateral cataract removal and monofocal IOL implantation using the ORA SYSTEM at 177 sites in the United States. Two datasets were analyzed: All Eyes (ie, all eligible eyes) and First Surgery Eyes (ie, each patient's first implanted eye). All Eyes were subgrouped by axial length (AL) and further analyzed. The main outcomes included paired differences in absolute prediction errors (APEs) between the ORA SYSTEM and BTK and differences in the proportion of eyes with APEs of ≤0.25 diopter (D) and ≤0.50 D.

Results: 1067 eyes were analyzed, including 897 First Surgery Eyes. Significantly higher proportions of All Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D ( = 0.0128) and ≤0.50 D ( < 0.0001) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. Similarly, significantly higher proportions of First Surgery Eyes had APEs of ≤0.25 D ( = 0.0037) and ≤0.50 D ( = 0.0004) using the ORA SYSTEM than the BTK formula. In both datasets, mean ( < 0.0001) and median ( ≤0.0005) APEs were significantly lower with the ORA SYSTEM than with the BTK formula. AL did not affect the differences in prediction accuracy between these IOL power calculations.

Conclusion: In post-myopic PRK or LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery, the ORA SYSTEM provided significantly more accurate refractive predictability than the BTK formula, as determined by mean and median APE.

References
1.
Shammas H, Shammas M . No-history method of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 33(1):31-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.045. View

2.
Fram N, Masket S, Wang L . Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(6):1096-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.027. View

3.
Kim J, Kim M, Ha Y, Paik H, Kim D . Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation by preoperative management of dry eye disease. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21(1):364. PMC: 8515725. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02129-5. View

4.
Cionni R, Dimalanta R, Breen M, Hamilton C . A large retrospective database analysis comparing outcomes of intraoperative aberrometry with conventional preoperative planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44(10):1230-1235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.016. View

5.
Abulafia A, Hill W, Koch D, Wang L, Barrett G . Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42(3):363-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.039. View