» Articles » PMID: 39719531

Updated Meta-analysis for Antihypertensive Treatment Guided by Home Blood Pressure Compared to Treatment Based on Office Blood Pressure: Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Hypertens Res
Date 2024 Dec 24
PMID 39719531
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Home blood pressure (BP) measurement is widely used, and home BP plays a central role in hypertension management in clinical practice in Japan. We updated the systematic review to determine whether home BP-based antihypertensive treatment is superior to office BP-based treatment in improving clinical outcomes, including BP levels, in adult patients with essential hypertension. A literature search identified 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The results of meta-analysis revealed that home BP-based antihypertensive treatment was significantly associated with greater reductions in ambulatory systolic BP by 2.73 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.23 to -2.22 mmHg; p = 0.03) and ambulatory diastolic BP by 1.61 mmHg (95% CI, -3.21 to -0.01 mmHg; p = 0.05) compared to office BP-based treatment. No RCTs evaluating cardiovascular outcomes other than ambulatory BP reduction were identified. Consistent with the previous review, this updated meta-analysis revealed home BP-based antihypertensive treatment is strongly recommended over office BP-based treatment for BP control in patients with essential hypertension.

References
1.
Imai Y, Obara T, Asamaya K, Ohkubo T . The reason why home blood pressure measurements are preferred over clinic or ambulatory blood pressure in Japan. Hypertens Res. 2013; 36(8):661-72. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2013.38. View

2.
Imai Y, Kario K, Shimada K, Kawano Y, Hasebe N, Matsuura H . The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure at Home (Second Edition). Hypertens Res. 2012; 35(8):777-95. DOI: 10.1038/hr.2012.56. View

3.
Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y . The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res. 2019; 42(9):1235-1481. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9. View

4.
Satoh M, Maeda T, Hoshide S, Ohkubo T . Is antihypertensive treatment based on home blood pressure recommended rather than that based on office blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension? (meta-analysis). Hypertens Res. 2019; 42(6):807-816. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-019-0221-y. View

5.
Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche P, Ioannidis J . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000100. PMC: 2707010. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100. View