» Articles » PMID: 39717993

Determinants of Liraglutide Treatment Discontinuation in Type 1 Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis of ADJUNCT ONE and ADJUNCT TWO Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 24
PMID 39717993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Two phase 3 randomized controlled studies (ADJUNCT ONE (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01836523), ADJUNCT TWO (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02098395)) evaluated liraglutide (1.8, 1.2 or 0.6 mg) vs placebo in participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as an adjunct to insulin therapy. This paper aims to improve our understanding of the potential mechanisms leading to premature discontinuation of this treatment regimen.

Methods: Post hoc comparisons were conducted on baseline characteristics and adverse event (AE) rates of participants completing and not completing the ADJUNCT studies due to AEs/lack of tolerance using summary tables and variance analysis.

Results: Non-completers (liraglutide and placebo combined) had lower baseline body mass index (BMI) (ADJUNCT ONE: 27.8 kg/m vs 29.8 kg/m, < .0001; ADJUNCT TWO: 26.3 kg/m vs 29.2 kg/m, < .0001), longer duration of T1D (25.8 years vs 21.0 years, < .0001; 24.1 years vs 21.0 years, = .04), lower daily insulin doses by continuous infusion (46.4 U vs 57.3 U, = .01; 40.9 U vs 57.4 U, = .12) or multiple injections (58.4 U vs 68.5 U, = .006; 56.0 U vs 65.8 U, =.03) and a higher proportion of participants with undetectable C-peptide (91.5% vs 81.3%; 87.0% vs 84.9%) compared to completers. When analyzed by treatment group, only duration of T1D and C-peptide differed between completers and non-completers among liraglutide (and not placebo) participants. The AE rates were higher for non-completers.

Conclusion: Individuals with longer-standing T1D and low levels of C-peptide at baseline were more likely to discontinue adjunctive liraglutide treatment due to AEs/lack of tolerance than individuals with residual insulin production. Lower BMI predicted a greater likelihood of non-completion for the included participants, regardless of treatment. These new findings may be relevant for clinical practice.

References
1.
Frampton R, Snaith J, Hocking S, Holmes-Walker J, Olsen N, Greenfield J . Reducing cardiometabolic risk with semaglutide in type 1 diabetes (RESET1): Study protocol of a phase 2 double-blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2024; 41(10):e15377. DOI: 10.1111/dme.15377. View

2.
Kuhadiya N, Malik R, Bellini N, Patterson J, Traina A, Makdissi A . Liraglutide as additional treatment to insulin in obese patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2013; 19(6):963-7. DOI: 10.4158/EP13065.OR. View

3.
Chillaron J, Flores Le-Roux J, Benaiges D, Pedro-Botet J . Type 1 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk. Metabolism. 2013; 63(2):181-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.10.002. View

4.
Kueh M, Chew N, Al-Ozairi E, le Roux C . The emergence of obesity in type 1 diabetes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2023; 48(3):289-301. PMC: 10896727. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-023-01429-8. View

5.
Chiesa S, Marcovecchio M . Preventing Cardiovascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes: The Need for a Lifetime Approach. Front Pediatr. 2021; 9:696499. PMC: 8219852. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.696499. View