» Articles » PMID: 39717672

Simple Prediction Model for Vitamin D Deficiency in Women with Osteoporosis or Risk Factors for Osteoporosis in Thailand

Abstract

Introduction: In Thailand, the assessment of vitamin D status by measuring 25-hydroxyvitamin D[25(OH)D] levels in individuals at risk for osteoporosis is constrained by limited facilities and high costs. This study aimed to create a clinical model for predicting vitamin D deficiency in women with osteoporosis or risk factors for osteoporosis.

Materials And Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 490 women. All participants had 25(OH)D levels measured. A questionnaire was used to assess factors related to vitamin D status. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25(OH)D levels < 30 ng/mL. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate predictors of vitamin D deficiency. In the model, odds ratios (ORs) were converted into simple scores. The optimal cutoff for women at a high risk of vitamin D deficiency was established. Internal validation was assessed using a Bootstrap.

Results: Sixty percent had vitamin D deficiency. The final model for predicting vitamin D deficiency consisted of a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m (OR:1.15), lack of exercise (OR:1.59), exercise 1-2 times/week (OR:1.40), sunlight exposure < 15 min/day (OR:1.70), no vitamin D supplementation (OR:8.76), and vitamin D supplementation of 1-20,000 IU/week (OR:2.31). The area under the curve was 0.747. At a cutoff of 6.6 in total risk score (range 4-13.6), the model predicted vitamin D deficiency with a sensitivity of 71.9 % and a specificity of 65.3 %. The internal validation by Bootstrap revealed a ROC of 0.737.

Conclusions: In women at risk of osteoporosis, a simple risk score can identify individuals with a high risk of vitamin D deficiency. These women could benefit from vitamin D supplementation without requiring 25(OH)D measurements.

References
1.
Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, Gillain S, Cavalier E, Slomian J . The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(11):4336-45. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-1742. View

2.
Drincic A, Armas L, Van Diest E, Heaney R . Volumetric dilution, rather than sequestration best explains the low vitamin D status of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012; 20(7):1444-8. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.404. View

3.
Chakhtoura M, Bacha D, Gharios C, Ajjour S, Assaad M, Jabbour Y . Vitamin D Supplementation and Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 107(3):882-898. PMC: 8852203. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab742. View

4.
Siwamogsatham O, Ongphiphadhanakul B, Tangpricha V . Vitamin D deficiency in Thailand. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2017; 2(1):48-49. PMC: 5685050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2014.10.004. View

5.
Yao P, Bennett D, Mafham M, Lin X, Chen Z, Armitage J . Vitamin D and Calcium for the Prevention of Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(12):e1917789. PMC: 6991219. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17789. View