Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey

Overview

Journal Risk Manag Healthc Policy

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Dec 24

PMID 39717361

Authors

Amelie Koch

Larissa Brust

Matthias Weigl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: In order to obtain sustainable healthcare, engagement of patients in patient safety improvement is vital. Drawing upon a multi-perspective approach, this study aimed to investigate perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on key implementation factors (ie, barriers and facilitators) for effective patient engagement (PE) in healthcare organizations to improve patient safety.

Patients And Methods: A two-round Delphi technique comprising semi-structured interviews and an online survey was applied to consolidate the individual perspectives of stakeholders and establish consensus on factors (expected, potential or experienced) that facilitate or mitigate successful implementation of PE in healthcare organizations (ie, all types, including hospital and outpatient medical practices). Adult, German-speaking experts in patient safety or PE (ie, with professional background or personal experience) were eligible to participate. Purposive and convenience sampling for inclusion of different healthcare professionals and patient representatives was established. Thirty-four panelists participated in data collection.

Results: We identified eight key barriers and seven facilitators for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations. Time constraints and perceived low effectiveness of patient engagement activities were deemed as most critical barriers. Supportive organizational culture, education and training opportunities, and clearly nominated responsibilities for patient feedback and engagement were rated as the most important facilitators. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratings between patient representatives and healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of real-world implementation factors for effective patient engagement in healthcare organizations in Germany to improve patient safety. Our insights may further inform recommendations for future development and implementation of effective patient involvement in healthcare organizations, especially for similar countries with low levels of PE.

Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (ID: DRKS00031837).

Citing Articles

Safety Culture Through Patient Voice: Qualitative Validation of the Patients' Perceptions of Safety Culture Scale (PaPSC) in Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery.

Monaca C, Weigl M, Pfaff H, Hammer A Health Expect. 2025; 28(2):e70213.

PMID: 40045553 PMC: 11882746. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70213.

References

Chegini Z, Arab-Zozani M, Islam S, Tobiano G, Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S . Barriers and facilitators to patient engagement in patient safety from patients and healthcare professionals' perspectives: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Nurs Forum. 2021; 56(4):938-949. DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12635. View

Carman K, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C . Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):223-31. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133. View

van der Voorden M, Ahaus K, Franx A . Explaining the negative effects of patient participation in patient safety: an exploratory qualitative study in an academic tertiary healthcare centre in the Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(1):e063175. PMC: 9827266. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063175. View

Bergerum C, Kullen Engstrom A, Thor J, Wolmesjo M . Patient involvement in quality improvement - a 'tug of war' or a dialogue in a learning process to improve healthcare?. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):1115. PMC: 7709309. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05970-4. View

Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S . The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011; 24(1):28-38. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. View

Westerink H, Oirbans T, Garvelink M, van Uden-Kraan C, Zouitni O, Bart H . Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations: A systematic review. Health Policy. 2023; 138:104946. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104946. View

Gargon E, Crew R, Burnside G, Williamson P . Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 108:110-120. PMC: 6438267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010. View

Liang L, Cako A, Urquhart R, Straus S, Wodchis W, Baker G . Patient engagement in hospital health service planning and improvement: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(1):e018263. PMC: 5829665. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018263. View

Hickmann E, Richter P, Schlieter H . All together now - patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1116. PMC: 9440506. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5. View

10.

Spranger J, Homberg A, Sonnberger M, Niederberger M . Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022; 172:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025. View

11.

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

12.

Moon M . Triangulation: A Method to Increase Validity, Reliability, and Legitimation in Clinical Research. J Emerg Nurs. 2019; 45(1):103-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004. View

13.

Schrappe M, Muller H, Hecker R . [Patient safety: current problems and challenges]. Internist (Berl). 2020; 61(5):470-474. DOI: 10.1007/s00108-020-00779-z. View

14.

Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

15.

Anderson N, Baker G, Moody L, Scane K, Urquhart R, Wodchis W . Consensus on how to optimise patient/family engagement in hospital planning and improvement: a Delphi survey. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(9):e061271. PMC: 9490572. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061271. View

16.

Hajat C, Stein E . The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review. Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12:284-293. PMC: 6214883. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008. View

17.

Malfait S, Van Hecke A, De Bodt G, Palsterman N, Eeckloo K . Patient and public involvement in hospital policy-making: Identifying key elements for effective participation. Health Policy. 2018; 122(4):380-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.02.007. View

18.

Hung L, Wong K, Chan I, Vasarhelyi K . Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in building learning health systems in community health services settings: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e073837. PMC: 10503319. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073837. View

19.

Holtz V, Jonitz G . [National health target on patient safety]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022; 66(1):92-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03636-6. View

20.

Oldfield B, Harrison M, Genao I, Greene A, Pappas M, Glover J . Patient, Family, and Community Advisory Councils in Health Care and Research: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 34(7):1292-1303. PMC: 6614241. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4565-9. View