» Articles » PMID: 39715788

Telemedicine-based Exercise Intervention in Cancer Survivors: a Non-randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Dec 23
PMID 39715788
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer survivors (CS) often experience treatment-related side effects, such as fatigue, and have reduced physical function. Regular physical activity has been demonstrated to reduce these symptoms and improve cardiopulmonary fitness. Digital solutions are needed to optimize exercise options for CS in aftercare, especially given the significant limitations during the Covid-19 pandemic. This two-armed, non-randomized, controlled intervention study for CS aims to investigate whether a telemedicine-based exercise intervention is as effective as the current standard of care for oncological exercise therapy in aftercare. Patients in the intervention group (n = 61) performed a telemedicine-based exercise program (TE) and patients in the control group (n = 31) participated in an existing rehabilitation sports group (RG) over a six-month intervention period. The primary outcome was cardiopulmonary fitness measured by VOpeak; secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL), fatigue, and physical activity. A non-inferiority analysis was performed with a predefined non-inferiority margin for relative VOpeak of -1.50 ml/min/kg. Although TE demonstrated a slight advantage in relative VOpeak compared to RG (adjusted mean difference of 0.55 ml/min/kg [95% CI: -2.74; 3.84]), the non-inferiority was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the implementation of a telemedicine-based exercise intervention indicates that individual patients respond well to this type of exercise program and benefit from the intervention, particularly in terms of QoL. Finding an individualized program for each cancer survivor is the overarching goal. A telemedicine-based exercise intervention may be a promising option, particularly for younger patients.

References
1.
Rock C, Thomson C, Sullivan K, Howe C, Kushi L, Caan B . American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72(3):230-262. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21719. View

2.
Garber C, Blissmer B, Deschenes M, Franklin B, LaMonte M, Lee I . American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7):1334-59. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb. View

3.
Borg G . Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14(5):377-81. View

4.
Mama S, Lopez-Olivo M, Bhuiyan N, Leach H . Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions among Rural Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021; 30(12):2143-2153. PMC: 8643319. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0871. View

5.
Migueles J, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Nystrom C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Lof M . Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports Med. 2017; 47(9):1821-1845. PMC: 6231536. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0. View