Turning Stories into Learning Journeys: the Principles and Methods of Immersive Education

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 Dec 23

PMID 39712545

Authors

Riccardo Brunetti

Silvia Ferrante

Anna Maria Avella

Allegra Indraccolo

Claudia Del Gatto

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper describes the theoretical and practical aspects of Immersive Education, an educational methodology based on interactive narratives, articulated as emotional journeys, to develop competencies. It has been developed throughout three school years (2021-2024) with more than 400 students (8-12 years old) in Public Schools in Italy and Spain. Immersive Education can be integrated with curricular school activities and can be used to target both curricular and transversal learning objectives, specifically the ones connected with the Personal, Social and Learning to learn Key Competence (LifeComp European framework). The paper describes the inspirations that led to the creation of the methodology, including similar experiential learning approaches. It then analyses the theoretical principles of the methodology, dividing them in four key-concepts, along with psychological evidence supporting them. The four key-concepts describe how immersive education aims at being a motivation trigger, featuring a dramatic structure, how it is based on the involvement of the self, and how it focuses on fostering a continuous engagement. It continues with a detailed analysis of implementation strategies, specifically about the management of emotional triggers and reactions, enriched by numerous examples taken from the projects implemented with the students. The conclusions open the way to future research directions to measure the impact of this approach on the development of transversal and specific competences.

References

Green M, Brock T . The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000; 79(5):701-21. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701. View

Leslie A, Friedman O, German T . Core mechanisms in "theory of mind". Trends Cogn Sci. 2004; 8(12):528-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.001. View

Delogu F, Raffone A, Olivetti Belardinelli M . Semantic encoding in working memory: is there a (multi)modality effect?. Memory. 2009; 17(6):655-63. DOI: 10.1080/09658210902998054. View

Taylor S, Brown J . Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(2):193-210. View

Schupp H, Stockburger J, Codispoti M, Junghofer M, Weike A, Hamm A . Selective visual attention to emotion. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(5):1082-9. PMC: 6673176. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3223-06.2007. View

Sedikides C, Green J . On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 79(6):906-22. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.906. View

Isen A, Daubman K, Nowicki G . Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987; 52(6):1122-31. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1122. View

Ma Z, Nan X . Friends Don't Let Friends Smoke: How Storytelling and Social Distance Influence Nonsmokers' Responses to Antismoking Messages. Health Commun. 2017; 33(7):887-895. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1321162. View

Santangelo V, Spence C . Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007; 33(6):1311-21. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1311. View

10.

Pannunzi M, Perez-Bellido A, Pereda-Banos A, Lopez-Moliner J, Deco G, Soto-Faraco S . Deconstructing multisensory enhancement in detection. J Neurophysiol. 2014; 113(6):1800-18. PMC: 4359994. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00341.2014. View

11.

Lunn J, Sjoblom A, Ward J, Soto-Faraco S, Forster S . Multisensory enhancement of attention depends on whether you are already paying attention. Cognition. 2019; 187:38-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.008. View

12.

Hon N, Yeo N . Having a sense of agency can improve memory. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(3):946-952. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01849-x. View

13.

Xu H, Ge S, Yuan F . Research on the Mechanism of Influence of Game Competition Mode on Online Learning Performance. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022; 12(7). PMC: 9312023. DOI: 10.3390/bs12070225. View

14.

Carlson S, Koenig M, Harms M . Theory of mind. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 4(4):391-402. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1232. View

15.

Shams L, Seitz A . Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008; 12(11):411-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006. View

16.

Melo M, Goncalves G, Monteiro P, Coelho H, Vasconcelos-Raposo J, Bessa M . Do Multisensory Stimuli Benefit the Virtual Reality Experience? A Systematic Review. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020; 28(2):1428-1442. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3010088. View

17.

Sui J, He X, Humphreys G . Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(5):1105-17. DOI: 10.1037/a0029792. View

18.

Zou X, Chen Y, Xiao Y, Zhou Q, Zhang X . Better Controlled, Better Maintained: Sense of Agency Facilitates Working Memory. Conscious Cogn. 2023; 110:103501. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2023.103501. View

19.

Jeong J, Diwadkar V, Chugani C, Sinsoongsud P, Muzik O, Behen M . Congruence of happy and sad emotion in music and faces modifies cortical audiovisual activation. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(4):2973-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.017. View

20.

Cunningham S, Turk D, Macdonald L, Neil Macrae C . Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Conscious Cogn. 2007; 17(1):312-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003. View