» Articles » PMID: 39711518

The Effective Use by Primary Care Clinicians of a Comprehensive Computerized Insulin Dose Adjustment Algorithm

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Dec 23
PMID 39711518
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Primary care clinicians (PCCs) manage 90% of patients with diabetes, 30% of whom require insulin with a substantial number poorly controlled because of the challenges that PCCs face (time constraints and lack of experience). The author has developed Federal Drug Administration cleared and Conformite Europeenne mark registered comprehensive computerized insulin dose adjustment algorithms (CIDAAs) to enable PCCs to significantly lower HbA1c levels in insulin-requiring patients. Reports sent to PCCs contain scatter plots of glucose readings, their organization into pre- and postprandial and before bedtime values, their analyses, and recommendations for insulin dose adjustments (if indicated) that the PCC can accept or modify. The glucose readings are provided to the CIDAAs for analysis at either in-person visits or remotely. The new doses accepted by PCCs serve as the basis for the subsequent report. Published studies evaluating this comprehensive CIDAA involved 104 poorly controlled patients taking insulin for greater than or equal to six months who were independently managed by PCCs. Over four to six months, initial HbA1c levels of 9.7% fell by 1.7%. Combining these results with 138 other better controlled patients in real-world situations, initial measured and estimated HbA1c levels of 8.3% fell by 0.7% in 6.4 months enabling PCCs to significantly improve glycemic control. Other advantages of PCCs utilizing these comprehensive CIDAAs are saving time for PCCs so that they can address non-diabetes issues and/or see other patients and ongoing PCC education in adjusting insulin doses by matching glucose patterns and dose-change recommendations with subsequent glycemic responses.

References
1.
Nathan D, Kuenen J, Borg R, Zheng H, Schoenfeld D, Heine R . Translating the A1C assay into estimated average glucose values. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(8):1473-8. PMC: 2742903. DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0545. View

2.
Evans M, Smart C, Paramalingam N, Smith G, Jones T, King B . Dietary protein affects both the dose and pattern of insulin delivery required to achieve postprandial euglycaemia in Type 1 diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabet Med. 2018; 36(4):499-504. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13875. View

3.
Martens T . Roadmap to the Effective Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care. Diabetes Spectr. 2023; 36(4):306-314. PMC: 10654126. DOI: 10.2337/dsi23-0001. View

4.
Amante D, Harlan D, Lemon S, McManus D, Olaitan O, Pagoto S . Evaluation of a Diabetes Remote Monitoring Program Facilitated by Connected Glucose Meters for Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Diabetes. 2021; 6(1):e25574. PMC: 7995078. DOI: 10.2196/25574. View

5.
Davidson M, Davidson S . Effect of Remote Glucose Monitoring Utilizing Computerized Insulin Dose Adjustment Algorithms: A Pilot Project. Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(2):523-533. PMC: 6437238. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-019-0565-y. View