Effects of Seasonal Climates and MIPS1 Mutations on Soybean Germination Through Multi-omics Analysis

Overview

Journal BMC Plant Biol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Dec 22

PMID 39710639

Authors

Huakun Yu

Longming Zhu

Yuhao Chen

Ping Deng

Bei Liu

Xiaochao Chen

Fengjie Yuan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study delves into the combined effects of seasonal climate variations and MIPS1 gene mutations on the germination rates of soybean cultivars TW-1 and TW75. Through comprehensive metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses, we identified key KEGG pathways significantly affected by these factors, including starch and sucrose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis. These pathways were notably disrupted during the spring, leading to an imbalance in metabolic reserves critical for seedling development. Additionally, MIPS1 gene mutations further altered these pathways, exacerbating the metabolic disturbances. Our results underscore the intricate network of environmental and genetic interactions influencing soybean seed vigor and underscore the importance of understanding these pathways to enhance agricultural resilience and seed quality in fluctuating climates.

References

Colombo F, Pagano A, Sangiorgio S, Macovei A, Balestrazzi A, Araniti F . Study of Seed Ageing in Maize Mutant and Two Possible Approaches to Restore Seed Germination. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1). PMC: 9820859. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010732. View

Sparvoli F, Cominelli E . Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant?. Plants (Basel). 2016; 4(4):728-55. PMC: 4844270. DOI: 10.3390/plants4040728. View

Yuan F, Yu X, Dong D, Yang Q, Fu X, Zhu S . Whole genome-wide transcript profiling to identify differentially expressed genes associated with seed field emergence in two soybean low phytate mutants. BMC Plant Biol. 2017; 17(1):16. PMC: 5242038. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0953-7. View

Guo J, Sun B, He H, Zhang Y, Tian H, Wang B . Current Understanding of bHLH Transcription Factors in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(9). PMC: 8125693. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094921. View

Redekar N, Pilot G, Raboy V, Li S, Saghai Maroof M . Inference of Transcription Regulatory Network in Low Phytic Acid Soybean Seeds. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:2029. PMC: 5714895. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02029. View

Vincent J, Stacey M, Stacey G, Bilyeu K . Phytic Acid and Inorganic Phosphate Composition in Soybean Lines with Independent IPK1 Mutations. Plant Genome. 2020; 8(1):eplantgenome2014.10.0077. DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2014.10.0077. View

Bellieny-Rabelo D, de Oliveira E, Ribeiro E, Costa E, Oliveira A, Motta Venancio T . Transcriptome analysis uncovers key regulatory and metabolic aspects of soybean embryonic axes during germination. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:36009. PMC: 5099898. DOI: 10.1038/srep36009. View

Valliyodan B, Ye H, Song L, Murphy M, Shannon J, Nguyen H . Genetic diversity and genomic strategies for improving drought and waterlogging tolerance in soybeans. J Exp Bot. 2016; 68(8):1835-1849. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw433. View

Yuan F, Zhu D, Deng B, Fu X, Dong D, Zhu S . Effects of two low phytic acid mutations on seed quality and nutritional traits in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr). J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(9):3632-8. DOI: 10.1021/jf803862a. View

10.

Bisht A, Saini D, Kaur B, Batra R, Kaur S, Kaur I . Multi-omics assisted breeding for biotic stress resistance in soybean. Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50(4):3787-3814. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08260-4. View

11.

Koramutla M, Negi M, Ayele B . Roles of Glutathione in Mediating Abscisic Acid Signaling and Its Regulation of Seed Dormancy and Drought Tolerance. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(10). PMC: 8535772. DOI: 10.3390/genes12101620. View

12.

Zhang H, Hu Z, Yang Y, Liu X, Lv H, Song B . Transcriptome profiling reveals the spatial-temporal dynamics of gene expression essential for soybean seed development. BMC Genomics. 2021; 22(1):453. PMC: 8207594. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07783-z. View

13.

Guo M, Liu J, Ma X, Luo D, Gong Z, Lu M . The Plant Heat Stress Transcription Factors (HSFs): Structure, Regulation, and Function in Response to Abiotic Stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:114. PMC: 4746267. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00114. View

14.

Cheng M, Ko K, Chang W, Kuo W, Chen G, Lin T . Increased glutathione contributes to stress tolerance and global translational changes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015; 83(5):926-39. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12940. View

15.

Liu H, Li X, Zhang Q, Yuan P, Liu L, King G . Integrating a genome-wide association study with transcriptomic data to predict candidate genes and favourable haplotypes influencing Brassica napus seed phytate. DNA Res. 2021; 28(5). PMC: 8435555. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsab011. View

16.

Frank T, Norenberg S, Engel K . Metabolite profiling of two novel low phytic acid (lpa) soybean mutants. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(14):6408-16. DOI: 10.1021/jf901019y. View

17.

DeMers L, Raboy V, Li S, Saghai Maroof M . Network Inference of Transcriptional Regulation in Germinating Low Phytic Acid Soybean Seeds. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:708286. PMC: 8438133. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.708286. View

18.

Manoharlal R, Saiprasad G . Assessment of germination, phytochemicals, and transcriptional responses to ethephon priming in soybean [ (L.) Merrill]. Genome. 2019; 62(12):769-783. DOI: 10.1139/gen-2019-0013. View

19.

Feng Z, Ding C, Li W, Wang D, Cui D . Applications of metabolomics in the research of soybean plant under abiotic stress. Food Chem. 2019; 310:125914. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125914. View

20.

Wang W, Xie Y, Liu L, King G, White P, Ding G . Genetic Control of Seed Phytate Accumulation and the Development of Low-Phytate Crops: A Review and Perspective. J Agric Food Chem. 2022; 70(11):3375-3390. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c06831. View