» Articles » PMID: 39708236

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences with Expanded Noninvasive Prenatal Screening: Challenges and Solutions

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Dec 21
PMID 39708236
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal cell-free DNA screening (NIPT) can lead to the early detection of important health-related information for the fetus and pregnant woman. However, the expanding scope of screening heightens information complexity and creates challenges for clinical interactions. This study explored Belgian healthcare professionals' experiences to identify challenges and solutions to expanded NIPT in practice. We assessed experiences of 31 healthcare professionals including clinical geneticists, gynecologists, midwives, counselors, and laboratory specialists, in Belgium where NIPT is publicly reimbursed. The interviews were analyzed inductively and iteratively. Key challenges to expanded NIPT were identified and structured under three headings: (1) Pre-test information provision: The more is tested for, the more complex the information provision becomes; (2) Return of results: Knowing more might be worse than knowing less; and (3) Hurdles that complicate setting a (nation-wide) scope. Solutions mentioned included providing additional resources for counseling, implementing value-based counseling, and a uniform scope of NIPT. To minimize potential harms and to retain trust of NIPT-users, it is crucial that best practices for counseling and reporting results are more substantiated. Sustainable lines of communication should be developed across stakeholder groups to navigate transparent implementation of technological developments in prenatal genetic screening.

References
1.
Abousleiman C, Lismonde A, Jani J . Concerns following rapid implementation of first-line screening for aneuploidy by cell-free DNA analysis in the Belgian healthcare system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(6):847-848. DOI: 10.1002/uog.20280. View

2.
Amant F, Verheecke M, Wlodarska I, Dehaspe L, Brady P, Brison N . Presymptomatic Identification of Cancers in Pregnant Women During Noninvasive Prenatal Testing. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(6):814-9. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1883. View

3.
Beulen L, van den Berg M, Faas B, Feenstra I, Hageman M, van Vugt J . The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016; 24(10):1409-16. PMC: 5027684. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.39. View

4.
Bowman-Smart H, Savulescu J, Mand C, Gyngell C, Pertile M, Lewis S . 'Small cost to pay for peace of mind': Women's experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 59(5):649-655. PMC: 6850570. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12945. View

5.
Chen S, Wasserman D . A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents. Am J Bioeth. 2016; 17(1):3-18. DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1251632. View