» Articles » PMID: 39698059

Pathogenic Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in RhoA Gene: Insights into Structural and Functional Impacts on RhoA-PLD1 Interaction Through Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Overview
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2024 Dec 19
PMID 39698059
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Molecular switches serve as key regulators of biological systems by acting as one of the crucial driving forces in the initiation of signal transduction pathway cascades. The Ras homolog gene family member A (RhoA) is one of the molecular switches that binds with GTP in order to cycle between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state. Any aberrance in control over this circuit, particularly due to any perturbation in switching, leads to the development of different pathogenicity. Consequently, the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the RhoA gene, especially deleterious genetic variations, are crucial to study to forecast structural alteration and their functional impacts in light of disease onset. In this comprehensive study, we employed a range of computational tools to screen the deleterious SNPs of RhoA from 207 nonsynonymous SNPs (nsSNPs). By utilizing 7 distinct tools for further analysis, 8 common deleterious SNPs were sorted, among them 5 nsSNPs (V9G, G17E, E40K, A61T, F171L) were found to be in the highly conserved regions, with E40K and A61T at G2 and G3 motif of the GTP-binding domain respectively, indicating potential perturbation in GTP/GDP binding ability of the protein. RhoA-GDP complex interacts with the enzyme phospholipase, specifically PLD1, to regulate different cellular activities. PLD1 is also a crucial regulator of thrombosis and cancer. In that line of focus, our initial structural analysis of Y66H, A61T, G17E, I86N, and I151T mutations of RhoA revealed remarkable decreased hydrophobicity from which we further filtered out G17E and I86N which may have potential impact on the RhoA-GDP-PLD1 complex. Intriguingly, the comparative 250 ns (ns) molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of these two mutated complexes revealed overall structural instability and altered interaction patterns. Therefore, further investigation into these deleterious mutations with and studies could lead to the identification of potential biomarkers in terms of different pathogenesis and could also be utilized in personalized therapeutic targets in the long run.

References
1.
Huang P, Altshuller Y, Hou J, Pessin J, Frohman M . Insulin-stimulated plasma membrane fusion of Glut4 glucose transporter-containing vesicles is regulated by phospholipase D1. Mol Biol Cell. 2005; 16(6):2614-23. PMC: 1142410. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-12-1124. View

2.
Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S . PubChem 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022; 51(D1):D1373-D1380. PMC: 9825602. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac956. View

3.
OHalloran P, Blackstock F, Shields N, Holland A, Iles R, Kingsley M . Motivational interviewing to increase physical activity in people with chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 28(12):1159-71. DOI: 10.1177/0269215514536210. View

4.
Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Fariselli P, Martelli P, Altman R, Casadio R . WS-SNPs&GO: a web server for predicting the deleterious effect of human protein variants using functional annotation. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14 Suppl 3:S6. PMC: 3665478. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S3-S6. View

5.
Bendl J, Musil M, Stourac J, Zendulka J, Damborsky J, Brezovsky J . PredictSNP2: A Unified Platform for Accurately Evaluating SNP Effects by Exploiting the Different Characteristics of Variants in Distinct Genomic Regions. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016; 12(5):e1004962. PMC: 4880439. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004962. View