Assessing the Professional Social Capital of Psychiatrists: Development of the Resource Generator for Psychiatrists (RG-Psy)

Overview

Journal Arch Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2024 Dec 19

PMID 39696621

Authors

Juliette Lagreula

Vincent Lorant

Olivia Dalleur

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: In the field of psychiatry, the dissemination of clinical innovations greatly depends on the social capital of clinicians. An instrument specifically aimed at measuring their professional social capital therefore needs to be developed.

Methods: This survey was conducted to develop and validate the Resource Generator for Psychiatrists, an 11-item questionnaire measuring the social capital of psychiatrists. The online questionnaire was administered through a link sent by e-mail to all psychiatrists and residents in psychiatry licensed to work in Belgium, after excluding ineligible psychiatrists. A total of 1618 psychiatrists or residents were reached. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Internal consistency was assessed using Pearson's correlation, item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was also measured. Multivariable linear regression analysis assessed the association between the total score of the social capital and psychiatrist demographics.

Results: A total of 196 psychiatrists responded to the survey (response rate: 12.1%). The Resource Generator for Psychiatrists showed a normal distribution with a mean of 23.6 (SD = 15.5), good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.81) and a good total Cronbach's alpha (0.74). Exploratory factor analysis revealed two main subtypes in psychiatrists' social capital: "Resources for the clinician" and "Resources for the professional", with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.62 and 0.7 respectively. Clinicians attending institutional seminars (β = 5.52, SE = 2.2, p = .013) and working in multidisciplinary settings, such as hospitals (β = 4.75, SE = 2.06, p = .023) or a mobile team (β = 8.75, SE = 3.52, p = .014) were more likely to have higher social capital.

Conclusion: Psychiatrists' access to professional resources can be reliably measured by using an 11-item questionnaire.

References

Mascia D, Cicchetti A . Physician social capital and the reported adoption of evidence-based medicine: exploring the role of structural holes. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72(5):798-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.011. View

Roux B, Sirois C, Niquille A, Spinewine A, Ouellet N, Petein C . Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in French. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020; 17(8):1453-1462. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.004. View

Jin H, Tappenden P, MacCabe J, Robinson S, McCrone P, Byford S . Cost and health impacts of adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence schizophrenia guideline recommendations. Br J Psychiatry. 2020; 218(4):224-229. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.241. View

West E, Barron D, Dowsett J, Newton J . Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48(5):633-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00361-x. View

Aitken C, Power R, Dwyer R . A very low response rate in an on-line survey of medical practitioners. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008; 32(3):288-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00232.x. View

Drake R, Goldman H, Leff H, Lehman A, Dixon L, Mueser K . Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(2):179-82. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.179. View

Cunningham C, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck C, Dixon E . Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:32. PMC: 4404667. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z. View

Keating N, Ayanian J, Cleary P, Marsden P . Factors affecting influential discussions among physicians: a social network analysis of a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(6):794-8. PMC: 2219865. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0190-8. View

Terwee C, Bot S, de Boer M, van der Windt D, Knol D, Dekker J . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006; 60(1):34-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012. View

10.

Hendra R, Hill A . Rethinking Response Rates: New Evidence of Little Relationship Between Survey Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias. Eval Rev. 2018; 43(5):307-330. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X18807719. View

11.

Fischler I, Riahi S, Stuckey M, Klassen P . Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for schizophrenia in a specialist mental health center: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(a):372. PMC: 4982005. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1618-9. View

12.

Aarons G . Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Ment Health Serv Res. 2004; 6(2):61-74. PMC: 1564126. DOI: 10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65. View

13.

Hawley K, Cook J, Jensen-Doss A . Do noncontingent incentives increase survey response rates among mental health providers? A randomized trial comparison. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009; 36(5):343-8. PMC: 2715443. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-009-0225-z. View

14.

Webber M, Huxley P . Measuring access to social capital: the validity and reliability of the Resource Generator-UK and its association with common mental disorder. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(3):481-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.030. View

15.

Collins D . Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003; 12(3):229-38. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023254226592. View

16.

Grava-Gubins I, Scott S . Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008; 54(10):1424-30. PMC: 2567275. View