» Articles » PMID: 39696097

Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs

Overview
Journal BMC Pulm Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2024 Dec 19
PMID 39696097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: UMEC/VI administered via a combination inhaler is associated with a clinically significant improvement in lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. However, their efficacy compared to other bronchodilator mono or dual therapies still remains unclear.

Objective: The objective of this research was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of UMEC/VI dual and UMEC/VI/FF triple therapies versus alternative bronchodilator regimens in COPD patients.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) to select publications published in peer-reviewed journals written in English. The odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) was calculated, along with their 95% confidence intervals. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane Q and I [2] statistics and the appropriate p-value. The analysis used RevMan 5.4.

Results: The current meta-analysis includes 31,814 COPD patients from 17 RCTs. The meta-analysis results demonstrate that the combination of LABA and LAMA provides additive bronchodilation and improved lung function in COPD patients. We found that UMEC/VI dual therapy significantly improved FEV1 (OR 1.98 [95% CI 1.70-2.30]), TDI values (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.72-2.26]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.99 [95% CI 1.71-2.32]), with fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.58 [95% CI 0.53-0.64]). Similarly, UMEC/VI/FF triple therapy also showed similar benefits, with significant improvements in FEV1 (OR 1.93 [95% CI 1.73-2.15]), TDI values (OR 2.37 [95% CI 2.15-2.61]), and reduced SGRQ total scores (OR 1.83 [95% CI 1.63-2.05]), and fewer drug-related adverse events (RR 0.53 [95% CI 0.49-0.58]).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis concludes that UMEC and VI combinations are an efficacious treatment option for symptomatic COPD patients.

References
1.
Viera A . Odds ratios and risk ratios: what's the difference and why does it matter?. South Med J. 2008; 101(7):730-4. DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31817a7ee4. View

2.
Singh D, Worsley S, Zhu C, Hardaker L, Church A . Umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in COPD: a randomised trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2015; 15:91. PMC: 4545560. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0092-1. View

3.
Lipson D, Barnhart F, Brealey N, Brooks J, Criner G, Day N . Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(18):1671-1680. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901. View

4.
Ismaila A, Rothnie K, Wood R, Banks V, Camidge L, Czira A . Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD in England following an exacerbation: a retrospective cohort study. Respir Res. 2023; 24(1):229. PMC: 10521462. DOI: 10.1186/s12931-023-02523-1. View

5.
Fazleen A, Wilkinson T . Early COPD: current evidence for diagnosis and management. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020; 14:1753466620942128. PMC: 7394029. DOI: 10.1177/1753466620942128. View