» Articles » PMID: 39695416

Economic Evaluation of Adding Dapagliflozin to Standard Care in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMC Nephrol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2024 Dec 18
PMID 39695416
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease is a significant public health issue. Dapagliflozin has been shown to improve the quality of life for patients with chronic kidney disease. This review aimed to systematically assess the cost-effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin to standard care compared with standard care alone for treating chronic kidney disease.

Methods: The relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane from the inception date to June 1, 2024. The titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently evaluated and screened by two authors. Additionally, the economic evaluation studies were assessed independently by two authors using the consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards checklist.

Results: 14 studies were included which were about the economic evaluations of adding dapagliflozin in the treatment of chronic kidney disease. The minimum consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards score for the studies was 0.77, indicating very good quality. Adding dapagliflozin to the standard of care would be more effective and cost-saving in Mexico, Malaysia, Canada, Thailand, and China. The highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of dapagliflozin ($67962.75/QALY) originated from the USA. According to the available studies, adding dapagliflozin to standard of care for the treatment of chronic kidney disease is considered cost-effectiveness from both the healthcare system and the payer's perspective.

Conclusion: Adding dapagliflozin to standard care in the treatment of chronic kidney disease is cost-effective from both the healthcare system and the payer's perspective in well-developed countries.

References
1.
Nerich V, Saing S, Gamper E, Kemmler G, Daval F, Pivot X . Cost-utility analyses of drug therapies in breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 159(3):407-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3924-7. View

2.
Wang L, Xu X, Zhang M, Hu C, Zhang X, Li C . Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in China: Results From the Sixth China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance. JAMA Intern Med. 2023; 183(4):298-310. PMC: 9941971. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6817. View

3.
Nguyen B, Mital S, Bugden S, Nguyen H . Cost-effectiveness of canagliflozin and dapagliflozin for treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023; 25(10):3030-3039. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15201. View

4.
Bello A, Okpechi I, Levin A, Ye F, Damster S, Arruebo S . An update on the global disparities in kidney disease burden and care across world countries and regions. Lancet Glob Health. 2024; 12(3):e382-e395. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00570-3. View

5.
Xue Y, Zou H, Ruan Z, Chen X, Lai Y, Yao D . Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of anti-obesity drugs for chronic weight management: a systematic review of literature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1254398. PMC: 10658190. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1254398. View