Epigenetics of Oogenesis

Overview

Journal Arch Gynecol Obstet

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2024 Dec 18

PMID 39694903

Authors

Neda Sindik

Nina Pereza

Sanja Devic Pavlic

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Epigenetic changes include all modifications affecting the expression of genes without changing the nucleotide sequence of the genome. Most studied epigenetic changes include DNA methylation, histone alterations and non-coding RNAs. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark, protecting the genome during gametogenesis and early embryo development. Demethylation process is a genome-wide event, taking place in two distinct waves during gametogenesis. The first event helps restore naïve pluripotency of the zygote, while the second event aids in the loss of parental epigenetic memory and facilitates specification of gametes. Histone modifications were recognized in murine and human primordial germ cells where their subsets condense chromatin, protecting it from dynamic changes taking place during gamete maturation. Deacetylation of histones was recognized as an important prerequisite of chromosomal segregation during metaphase II. Germline-specific ncRNAs and piRNAs are important in inhibiting transposon activity during gametogenesis, protecting overall genome stability. All epigenetic changes are prone to disruption, especially by exogenous factors. In recent years, with the increase in infertility, the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and its effects on epigenome remodeling of gametes have gained importance. The aim of this review is to summarize the epigenetic modifications crucial for oocyte development, while highlighting their role in reproductive disorders and ART.

References

Bernstein B, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Costello J, Ren B, Milosavljevic A, Meissner A . The NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(10):1045-8. PMC: 3607281. DOI: 10.1038/nbt1010-1045. View

Wang Y, Zeng X, Yang X, Liu W, Li P, Wang F . Real-Time Quantitative PCR Analysis of the Expression Pattern of the Hypoglycemic Gene in . Genes (Basel). 2020; 10(12). PMC: 6947438. DOI: 10.3390/genes10121044. View

Czukiewska S, Chuva de Sousa Lopes S . Fetal germ cell development in humans, a link with infertility. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 131:58-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.03.035. View

Kindsfather A, Czekalski M, Pressimone C, Erisman M, Mann M . Perturbations in imprinted methylation from assisted reproductive technologies but not advanced maternal age in mouse preimplantation embryos. Clin Epigenetics. 2019; 11(1):162. PMC: 6878706. DOI: 10.1186/s13148-019-0751-9. View

Sato A, Otsu E, Negishi H, Utsunomiya T, Arima T . Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted loci in superovulated oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2006; 22(1):26-35. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del316. View

Osman E, Franasiak J, Scott R . Oocyte and Embryo Manipulation and Epigenetics. Semin Reprod Med. 2019; 36(3-04):e1-e9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1688801. View

Li Y . Modern epigenetics methods in biological research. Methods. 2020; 187:104-113. PMC: 7785612. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.06.022. View

Gayon J . From Mendel to epigenetics: History of genetics. C R Biol. 2016; 339(7-8):225-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2016.05.009. View

Gao F, Das S . Epigenetic regulations through DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation: clues for early pregnancy in decidualization. Biomol Concepts. 2014; 5(2):95-107. PMC: 4262833. DOI: 10.1515/bmc-2013-0036. View

10.

Xu R, Li C, Liu X, Gao S . Insights into epigenetic patterns in mammalian early embryos. Protein Cell. 2020; 12(1):7-28. PMC: 7815849. DOI: 10.1007/s13238-020-00757-z. View

11.

Li S, Tollefsbol T . DNA methylation methods: Global DNA methylation and methylomic analyses. Methods. 2020; 187:28-43. PMC: 7914139. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.10.002. View

12.

Santiago M, Antunes C, Guedes M, Sousa N, Marques C . TET enzymes and DNA hydroxymethylation in neural development and function - how critical are they?. Genomics. 2014; 104(5):334-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.08.018. View

13.

Unnikrishnan A, Freeman W, Jackson J, Wren J, Porter H, Richardson A . The role of DNA methylation in epigenetics of aging. Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 195:172-185. PMC: 6397707. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.11.001. View

14.

Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag D . A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(5):1412-7. PMC: 1345710. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0510310103. View

15.

Cheng Y, Xie N, Jin P, Wang T . DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in stem cells. Cell Biochem Funct. 2015; 33(4):161-73. PMC: 4687961. DOI: 10.1002/cbf.3101. View

16.

Ibrahim J, Op de Beeck K, Fransen E, Peeters M, Van Camp G . Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling and identification of potential pan-cancer and tumor-specific biomarkers. Mol Oncol. 2022; 16(12):2432-2447. PMC: 9208075. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13176. View

17.

Qi X, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Chen T, Xiang Y, Hui J . The applications of CRISPR screen in functional genomics. Brief Funct Genomics. 2016; 16(1):34-37. DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elw020. View

18.

Li C, Ding L, Wang X, Shu P, Shi X, Zheng Z . A RBM47 and IGF2BP1 mediated circular FNDC3B-FNDC3B mRNA imbalance is involved in the malignant processes of osteosarcoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2023; 23(1):334. PMC: 10740216. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-03175-3. View

19.

Hancock G, Wamaitha S, Peretz L, Clark A . Mammalian primordial germ cell specification. Development. 2021; 148(6). PMC: 7990907. DOI: 10.1242/dev.189217. View

20.

Tang W, Dietmann S, Irie N, Leitch H, Floros V, Bradshaw C . A Unique Gene Regulatory Network Resets the Human Germline Epigenome for Development. Cell. 2015; 161(6):1453-67. PMC: 4459712. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.053. View