» Articles » PMID: 39692784

Occurrence, Multidrug Resistance, SCCmec Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus from Farmed Eggs and Environment

Overview
Journal Curr Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Dec 18
PMID 39692784
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on farmed eggs (n: 480) and environmental samples (n: 72; feed, water, and poultry droppings) from twenty-four deep litter and caged poultry layer farms across Punjab, India. The study noted a significantly higher occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus (31.67%; 95% CI 26.37-36.96%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (32.5%, 95% CI 23-43.3%) in deep litter farms (P < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed while the odds of presumptive MRSA from egg isolates were high (Odds ratio: 2.714; 95% CI 1.172, 6.284) in deep litter, conversely, resistance against ceftriaxone (0.279; 95% CI 0.129, 0.605), tetracycline (0.227; 95% CI 0.104, 0.497), and erythromycin (0.46; 95% CI 0.218, 0.973) was low. The multi-drug resistance was high and nearly equal; 68.53%, and 72.22% in deep litter and cage systems respectively. Additionally, around 89.65% and 77.7% of MRSA from deep litter and cage systems had multiple antibiotic resistance index > 0.2 respectively. Among the resistance genes under study, the odds of mecA and tetL were 2.417 and 8.029 times higher in deep litter. The hierarchical clustering of MRSA isolates based on the antibiogram profile depicted the formation of a large number of cluster solutions with a mix of isolates from both systems. The SCCmec typing revealed a predominance of type V in both the systems (34.4%; deep litter and 33.3%; cage), with a scarce distribution of other types and subtypes viz., deep litter: types III; 13.7%, IVc; 6.8%, II; 6.8%, IVa, and IVb; 3.4% and cage system: types III and IVc; 11.1%. To, the best of our knowledge current study is the first-ever comprehensive study on comparative occurrence, AMR profile, molecular characterization, and typing of MRSA from farmed eggs and environment from India.

References
1.
David M, Daum R . Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23(3):616-87. PMC: 2901661. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00081-09. View

2.
Popovich K, Weinstein R, Hota B . Are community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains replacing traditional nosocomial MRSA strains?. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 46(6):787-94. DOI: 10.1086/528716. View

3.
Casey A, Lambert P, Elliott T . Staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007; 29 Suppl 3:S23-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-8579(07)72175-1. View

4.
Omwenga I, Aboge G, Mitema E, Obiero G, Ngaywa C, Ngwili N . Antimicrobial Usage and Detection of Multidrug-Resistant , Including Methicillin-Resistant Strains in Raw Milk of Livestock from Northern Kenya. Microb Drug Resist. 2020; 27(6):843-854. DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0252. View

5.
Mahros M, Abd-Elghany S, Sallam K . Multidrug-, methicillin-, and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from ready-to-eat meat sandwiches: An ongoing food and public health concern. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021; 346:109165. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109165. View