» Articles » PMID: 39691741

Efficacy of Anti-obesity Medication (AOM) and Endoscopic Gastric Remodeling (EGR): Analysis of Combination Therapy with Optimal Timing and Agents

Overview
Journal Endosc Int Open
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Dec 18
PMID 39691741
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) and anti-obesity medications (AOMs) are effective weight loss therapies. While the efficacy of EGR and AOMs has been established, the effect of combination therapy and its optimal approach remain unknown. This was a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent EGR. Patients were categorized as: 1) monotherapy - EGR alone; 2) combination therapy - an AOM prescribed within 6 months of EGR; and 3) sequential therapy - an AOM prescribed greater than 6 months of EGR. Outcomes included percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months, response rate (≥ 10%TWL at 12 months), and serious adverse event rate. A total of 208 patients were included. Of them, 65 (34%), 61 (31%), and 82 (35%) underwent monotherapy, combination therapy, and sequential therapy, respectively. At 12 months, patients who received EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy achieved the greatest weight loss (23.7±4.6% TWL), while those who began with AOM followed by EGR more than 6 months later had the lowest weight loss (12.0±7.7%TWL) compared with monotherapy (17.3±10.0% TWL) ( = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). The response rate was 100% for EGR+GLP-1RA combination therapy and 56% for AOM followed by EGR sequential therapy ( = 0.02). Combining AOM with EGR appears to result in greater weight loss compared with other strategies, with GLP-1RA as the preferred agent and optimal initiation of both therapies occurring within 6 months of each other. Prolonged medication use prior to EGR appears to be associated with suboptimal weight loss, suggesting the importance of early referral for adjunctive therapy.

Citing Articles

Real-life data about obesity management.

Deviere J Endosc Int Open. 2025; 13:a25151487.

PMID: 40007645 PMC: 11855229. DOI: 10.1055/a-2515-1487.

References
1.
Jain P, Hejjaji V, Thomas M, Garcia R, Kennedy K, Goyal A . Use of primary bariatric surgery among patients with obesity and diabetes. Insights from the Diabetes Collaborative Registry. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022; 46(12):2163-2167. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-022-01217-w. View

2.
Abu Dayyeh B, Acosta A, Camilleri M, Mundi M, Rajan E, Topazian M . Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Alters Gastric Physiology and Induces Loss of Body Weight in Obese Individuals. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 15(1):37-43.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.030. View

3.
Ward Z, Bleich S, Cradock A, Barrett J, Giles C, Flax C . Projected U.S. State-Level Prevalence of Adult Obesity and Severe Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(25):2440-2450. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1909301. View

4.
Kumar N, Abu Dayyeh B, Lopez-Nava Breviere G, Galvao Neto M, Sahdala N, Shaikh S . Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty: procedure evolution from first-in-man cases through current technique. Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(4):2159-2164. PMC: 5845469. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5869-2. View

5.
Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L, Torres-Gonzalez A, Gra-Oramas B, Gonzalez-Fabian L . Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149(2):367-78.e5. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.005. View