» Articles » PMID: 39691649

Postoperative Complications and Cost Implications in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A National Inpatient Sample Study

Overview
Journal J Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Dec 18
PMID 39691649
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition affecting approximately 5 % of the global population, with significant prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and an estimated 89,079 cases in the United States. Osteonecrosis, particularly of the femoral head (ONFH), is a common orthopaedic complication in SCD, often requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) when conservative treatments fail. While THA can improve pain and function, it carries significant perioperative risks, with complication rates in patients with SCD as high as 67 %. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes, medical costs, and the impact of different THA implant designs in patients with SCD versus a matched non-SCD cohort.

Methods: The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without SCD undergoing total hip arthroplasty between the fourth quarter of 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression modeling. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined outcomes based on the use of cemented versus non-cemented implants.

Results: The study analyzed 2,830,040 hip arthroplasty patients, including 2535 with sickle cell disease (SCD), and after propensity score matching, found that patients with SCD had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, infections, and acute kidney injury. Multivariate analysis confirmed SCD as an independent risk factor for these complications, along with increased hospital stays and higher charges. Additionally, patients with SCD receiving cemented implants experienced worse outcomes, including higher risks of periprosthetic fractures and infections, compared to those with non-cemented implants.

Conclusion: This study found that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing total hip arthroplasty had significantly higher complication rates, increased healthcare costs, and longer hospital stays, with cemented implants posing greater risks compared to press-fit implants.

References
1.
Cusano J, Curry E, Kingston K, Klings E, Li X . Epidemiology and Perioperative Complications in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease After Orthopaedic Surgery: 26 Years' Experience at a Major Academic Center. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27(23):e1043-e1051. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00288. View

2.
Meissner N, Halder A, Schrednitzki D . Cemented and hybrid total hip arthroplasty lead to lower blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(10):6447-6451. PMC: 10088768. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04851-9. View

3.
Kamath A, McGraw M, Israelite C . Surgical management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients with sickle cell disease. World J Orthop. 2015; 6(10):776-82. PMC: 4644865. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i10.776. View

4.
Acuna A, Do M, Samuel L, Grits D, Otero J, Kamath A . Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(10):2965-2977. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04186-3. View

5.
Naseer Z, Bachabi M, Jones L, Sterling R, Khanuja H . Osteonecrosis in Sickle Cell Disease. South Med J. 2016; 109(9):525-30. DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000516. View