» Articles » PMID: 39691275

Establishing Meaningful Change Thresholds for European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire CLL-specific Module Domain Scores: An Analysis Based on the TRANSCEND CLL 004 Study in Patients with Relapsed Or...

Overview
Journal EJHaem
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Dec 18
PMID 39691275
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The study aimed to establish meaningful thresholds at patient and group levels for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire CLL-specific module (EORTC QLQ-CLL17) domain scores in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL).

Material And Methods: Data for the analysis were from the TRANSCEND CLL 004 study (NCT03331198). EORTC QLQ-CLL17 and selected anchor measures were assessed at baseline and multiple postbaseline visits up to 24 months after treatment initiation. Thresholds for each of the three EORTC QLQ-CLL17 domains were triangulated based on estimates derived from anchor- and distribution-based analyses, in accordance with published guidance.

Results: The analysis included 62 patients with 240 observations across visits. Meaningful change thresholds for improvement and deterioration, respectively, at the patient level were determined to be -11/+11 for symptom burden, -16/+16 for physical condition/fatigue and -16/+13 for worries/fears on health and functioning. The meaningful change thresholds for improvement and deterioration at the group level mostly ranged between 0.3 and 0.5 of the standard deviation of baseline domain scores.

Conclusions: These thresholds, based on EORTC QLQ-CLL17 domain scores, could help identify patients with meaningful changes in HRQOL and interpret treatment effects in future studies of treatments for adults with R/R CLL.

References
1.
Musoro J, Sodergren S, Coens C, Pochesci A, Terada M, King M . Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy. Colorectal Dis. 2020; 22(12):2278-2287. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15295. View

2.
Holtzer-Goor K, Schaafsma M, Joosten P, Posthuma E, Wittebol S, Huijgens P . Quality of life of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the Netherlands: results of a longitudinal multicentre study. Qual Life Res. 2015; 24(12):2895-906. PMC: 4615661. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1039-y. View

3.
Musoro J, Coens C, Greimel E, King M, Sprangers M, Nordin A . Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 159(2):515-521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.007. View

4.
Eichhorst B, Busch R, Obwandner T, Kuhn-Hallek I, Herschbach P, Hallek M . Health-related quality of life in younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide or fludarabine alone for first-line therapy: a study by the German CLL Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(13):1722-31. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6929. View

5.
Kutsch N, Bahlo J, Robrecht S, Franklin J, Zhang C, Maurer C . Long Term Follow-up Data and Health-Related Quality of Life in Frontline Therapy of Fit Patients Treated With FCR Versus BR (CLL10 Trial of the GCLLSG). Hemasphere. 2020; 4(1):e336. PMC: 7000471. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000336. View