» Articles » PMID: 39690352

Running on Fumes: An Analysis of Fine Particulate Matter's Impact on Finish Times in Nine Major US Marathons, 2003-2019

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Dec 17
PMID 39690352
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Under controlled conditions and in some observational studies of runners, airborne fine particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM) is associated with exercise performance decrements.

Objective: To assess the association between event-day fine particulate matter air pollution (PM) and marathon finish times.

Methods: Using a spatiotemporal machine-learning model, we estimated event-day racecourse-averaged PM concentrations for nine major US marathons (2003-2019). We obtained 1,506,137 male and 1,058,674 female finish times from 140 event-years of public marathon data. We used linear and quantile mixed models to estimate the mean and percentile-specific year and heat index-adjusted effect of 1 µg/m higher event-day racecourse-averaged PM on marathon finish times in sex-stratified samples.

Results: Analyzing all finish times, 1 µg/m higher race-day PM was associated with 32-s slower average finish times among men (95% confidence limits (CL) 30, 33 s) and 25-s slower average finish times among women (95% CL 23, 27 s). Quantile-specific associations of event-day PM with finish times were larger for faster-than-median finishers. While PM was generally associated with slower finish times in single-event models, there was effect heterogeneity, and most 95% confidence intervals included the null.

Conclusion: Greater race-day PM was associated with slower average marathon finish times, with more pronounced effects in faster-than-median runners. While more research is needed to characterize effect heterogeneity across the performance spectrum, these findings show the impact of PM on marathon performance and the importance of considering data from multiple competitions when estimating PM effects from event-level data.

References
1.
Xing Y, Xu Y, Shi M, Lian Y . The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system. J Thorac Dis. 2016; 8(1):E69-74. PMC: 4740125. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2016.01.19. View

2.
McDuffie E, Martin R, Spadaro J, Burnett R, Smith S, ORourke P . Source sector and fuel contributions to ambient PM and attributable mortality across multiple spatial scales. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):3594. PMC: 8203641. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23853-y. View

3.
Feng S, Gao D, Liao F, Zhou F, Wang X . The health effects of ambient PM2.5 and potential mechanisms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016; 128:67-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.01.030. View

4.
Pinkerton K, Green F, Saiki C, Vallyathan V, Plopper C, Gopal V . Distribution of particulate matter and tissue remodeling in the human lung. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(11):1063-9. PMC: 1240164. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.001081063. View

5.
Giles L, Koehle M . The health effects of exercising in air pollution. Sports Med. 2013; 44(2):223-49. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0108-z. View