Causes, Solutions and Health Inequalities: Comparing Perspectives of Professional Stakeholders and Community Participants Experiencing Low Income and Poor Health in London

Overview

Journal Health Expect

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 Dec 17

PMID 39688316

Authors

Neil McHugh

Rachel Baker

Cam Donaldson

Ahalya Bala

Marta Mojarrieta

Gregory White

Olga Biosca

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Engaging with the public can influence policy decisions, particularly towards more radical policy change. While established research exists exploring public perceptions on causes of health inequalities, much less exists on how to tackle health inequalities in the UK. Despite an emphasis on 'lived experience', currently no study has focused on how individuals with very poor health conceive of both causes of, and solutions to, health inequalities.

Methods: Q methodology was used to identify and describe the shared perspectives that exist on causes of, and solutions to, health inequalities experienced in low-income communities. Community participants living with low-incomes and poor health (n = 20) and professional stakeholders (n = 20) from London rank ordered 34 'Causes' and 39 'Solutions' statements onto quasi-normal shaped grids according to their point of view. Factor analysis defined factors for both 'Causes' and 'Solutions'.

Results: Analysis produced three-factor solutions for both the 'Causes' and 'Solutions'. 'Causes' are (i) 'Systemic inequality and poverty', (ii) 'Ignored and marginalised communities', (iii) 'Precariousness, chronic stress and hopelessness'. 'Solutions' are (i) 'Meeting basic needs and providing opportunities to thrive', (ii) 'Empowering individuals to take control', (iii) 'Supporting healthy choices'. No professional stakeholders aligned with 'Ignored and marginalised communities' while at least one community participant or professional stakeholder aligned with all other factors.

Conclusion: Results support the view that the public has a relatively sophisticated understanding of causes of health inequalities and help challenge assumptions held by policy actors that lay members of the public do not recognise and understand more upstream ways to respond to health inequalities.

Patient Or Public Contribution: The public contributed to the design of the Q study. Surveys and interviews with community participants informed the development of the statement set and the statement set was also piloted with community participants and finalised based on feedback.

References

Fergie G, Vaczy C, Smith K, Mackenzie M, Phan T, Hilton S . Young people's perspectives on addressing UK health inequalities: utopian visions and preferences for action. Health Expect. 2023; 26(6):2264-2277. PMC: 10632646. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13825. View

Biosca O, Bellazzecca E, Donaldson C, Bala A, Mojarrieta M, White G . Living on low-incomes with multiple long-term health conditions: A new method to explore the complex interaction between finance and health. PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305827. PMC: 11207141. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305827. View

McHugh N . Eliciting public values on health inequalities: missing evidence for ?. Evid Policy. 2023; 18(4):733-745. PMC: 7614257. DOI: 10.1332/174426421X16286783870175. View

Smith K, Anderson R . Understanding lay perspectives on socioeconomic health inequalities in Britain: a meta-ethnography. Sociol Health Illn. 2017; 40(1):146-170. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12629. View

Macaulay B, McHugh N, Steiner A . Public perspectives on health improvement within a remote-rural island community. Health Expect. 2021; 24(4):1286-1299. PMC: 8369116. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13260. View

Mason H, Collins M, McHugh N, Godwin J, van Exel J, Donaldson C . Is "end of life" a special case? Connecting Q with survey methods to measure societal support for views on the value of life-extending treatments. Health Econ. 2018; 27(5):819-831. PMC: 5900899. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3640. View

McHugh N, Baker R, Bambra C . Policy actors' perceptions of public participation to tackle health inequalities in Scotland: a paradox?. Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1):57. PMC: 10062251. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01869-8. View

Marmot M . Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on. BMJ. 2020; 368:m693. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m693. View

Lundell H, Niederdeppe J, Clarke C . Public views about health causation, attributions of responsibility, and inequality. J Health Commun. 2013; 18(9):1116-30. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.768724. View

10.

Putland C, Baum F, Ziersch A . From causes to solutions--insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:67. PMC: 3038904. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-67. View

11.

Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M . Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009; 64(4):284-91. PMC: 2921286. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.082743. View

12.

Naik Y, Baker P, Ismail S, Tillmann T, Bash K, Quantz D . Going upstream - an umbrella review of the macroeconomic determinants of health and health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):1678. PMC: 6915896. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7895-6. View

13.

Lynch J . Reframing inequality? The health inequalities turn as a dangerous frame shift. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017; 39(4):653-660. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw140. View

14.

Smith K, Macintyre A, Weakley S, Hill S, Escobar O, Fergie G . Public understandings of potential policy responses to health inequalities: Evidence from a UK national survey and citizens' juries in three UK cities. Soc Sci Med. 2021; 291:114458. PMC: 8711040. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114458. View

15.

Inglis G, McHardy F, Sosu E, McAteer J, Biggs H . Health inequality implications from a qualitative study of experiences of poverty stigma in Scotland. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 232:43-49. PMC: 6597943. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.033. View

16.

Blaxter M . Whose fault is it? People's own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(6):747-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00192-x. View

17.

Katikireddi S, Higgins M, Smith K, Williams G . Health inequalities: the need to move beyond bad behaviours. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013; 67(9):715-6. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2012-202064. View

18.

Bridger E, Tufte-Hewett A, Comerford D . Perceived health inequalities: are the UK and US public aware of occupation-related health inequality, and do they wish to see it reduced?. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2326. PMC: 10668500. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17120-6. View

19.

Fredriksson M, Tritter J . Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters. Sociol Health Illn. 2016; 39(1):95-111. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12483. View

20.

McHugh N, Baker R, Biosca O, Ibrahim F, Donaldson C . Who knows best? A Q methodology study to explore perspectives of professional stakeholders and community participants on health in low-income communities. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019; 19(1):35. PMC: 6332861. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3884-9. View