Exploring TAS2R46 Biomechanics Through Molecular Dynamics and Network Analysis

Overview

Journal Front Mol Biosci

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Dec 17

PMID 39687570

Authors

Marco Cannariato

Riccardo Fanunza

Eric A Zizzi

Marcello Miceli

Giacomo Di Benedetto

Marco A Deriu

Lorenzo Pallante

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Understanding the intricate interplay between structural features and signal-processing events is crucial for unravelling the mechanisms of biomolecular systems. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), a pervasive protein family in humans, serve a wide spectrum of vital functions. TAS2Rs, a subfamily of GPCRs, play a primary role in recognizing bitter molecules and triggering events leading to the perception of bitterness, a crucial defence mechanism against spoiled or poisonous food. Beyond taste, TAS2Rs function is associated with many diseases as they are expressed in several extra-oral tissues. Given that the precise functioning mechanisms of TAS2R remain poorly understood, this study employed molecular dynamics simulations combined with network-based analysis to investigate local conformational changes and global structural correlations in different states of the receptor. The focus was on the human TAS2R46 bitter taste receptor, recently resolved experimentally, both in the presence and absence of strychnine, a known bitter agonist. The results showed that the ligand-bound state of the receptor exhibited more correlated dynamics compared to the apo state, and the presence of the agonist mediated the allosteric network between two helices (TM3 and TM6) which mainly convey the signal transferring from the extracellular to the intracellular region. By elucidating the hallmarks of the conformational changes and allosteric network of TAS2R46 under varying conditions, this study has enabled the identification of the unique structural and dynamics features of this receptor, thereby establishing a foundation for a more profound characterisation of this intriguing class of receptors.

References

Xu J, Zhang Y . How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5?. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(7):889-95. PMC: 2913670. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq066. View

Behrens M, Meyerhof W . Mammalian bitter taste perception. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2009; 47:203-20. DOI: 10.1007/400_2008_5. View

Tian C, Kasavajhala K, Belfon K, Raguette L, Huang H, Migues A . ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solution. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 16(1):528-552. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591. View

Latorraca N, Venkatakrishnan A, Dror R . GPCR Dynamics: Structures in Motion. Chem Rev. 2016; 117(1):139-155. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177. View

Nowak S, Di Pizio A, Levit A, Niv M, Meyerhof W, Behrens M . Reengineering the ligand sensitivity of the broadly tuned human bitter taste receptor TAS2R14. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2018; 1862(10):2162-2173. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.07.009. View

Venkatakrishnan A, Deupi X, Lebon G, Tate C, Schertler G, Babu M . Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature. 2013; 494(7436):185-94. DOI: 10.1038/nature11896. View

Zhou Q, Yang D, Wu M, Guo Y, Guo W, Zhong L . Common activation mechanism of class A GPCRs. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6954041. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.50279. View

Kraskov A, Stogbauer H, Grassberger P . Estimating mutual information. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 69(6 Pt 2):066138. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066138. View

Lu P, Zhang C, Lifshitz L, Zhuge R . Extraoral bitter taste receptors in health and disease. J Gen Physiol. 2017; 149(2):181-197. PMC: 5299619. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201611637. View

10.

Wang J, Wolf R, Caldwell J, Kollman P, Case D . Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25(9):1157-74. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20035. View

11.

Topin J, Bouysset C, Pacalon J, Kim Y, Rhyu M, Fiorucci S . Functional molecular switches of mammalian G protein-coupled bitter-taste receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021; 78(23):7605-7615. PMC: 11073308. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-021-03968-7. View

12.

Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N . Differences in allosteric communication pipelines in the inactive and active states of a GPCR. Biophys J. 2014; 107(2):422-434. PMC: 4104064. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.015. View

13.

Siemers M, Lazaratos M, Karathanou K, Guerra F, Brown L, Bondar A . Bridge: A Graph-Based Algorithm to Analyze Dynamic H-Bond Networks in Membrane Proteins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2019; 15(12):6781-6798. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00697. View

14.

Di Pizio A, Levit A, Slutzki M, Behrens M, Karaman R, Niv M . Comparing Class A GPCRs to bitter taste receptors: Structural motifs, ligand interactions and agonist-to-antagonist ratios. Methods Cell Biol. 2016; 132:401-27. DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2015.10.005. View

15.

Webb B, Sali A . Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2016; 54:5.6.1-5.6.37. PMC: 5031415. DOI: 10.1002/cpbi.3. View

16.

Scheer A, Cotecchia S . Constitutively active G protein-coupled receptors: potential mechanisms of receptor activation. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 1997; 17(1-3):57-73. DOI: 10.3109/10799899709036594. View

17.

Gimpl G . Interaction of G protein coupled receptors and cholesterol. Chem Phys Lipids. 2016; 199:61-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.04.006. View

18.

Lee S, Depoortere I, Hatt H . Therapeutic potential of ectopic olfactory and taste receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018; 18(2):116-138. DOI: 10.1038/s41573-018-0002-3. View

19.

Behrens M, Ziegler F . Structure-Function Analyses of Human Bitter Taste Receptors-Where Do We Stand?. Molecules. 2020; 25(19). PMC: 7582848. DOI: 10.3390/molecules25194423. View

20.

Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K . VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14(1):33-8, 27-8. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. View