» Articles » PMID: 39687512

Transcriptomic Signatures of Antibody-mediated Rejection in Early Biopsies With Negative Histology in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Dec 17
PMID 39687512
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Presensitized patients with circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) before transplantation are at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Peritransplant desensitization mitigates but does not eliminate the alloimmune response. We examined the possibility that subthreshold AMR activity undetected by histology could be operating in some early biopsies.

Methods: Transcriptome of kidney allograft biopsies performed within the first month in presensitized patients (DSA) who had received desensitization and did not develop active/probable AMR by histology (R) was compared with biopsies showing active/probable AMR (R/DSA). As negative controls, biopsies without rejection by histology in patients without DSA at transplantation were used (R/DSA). RNA sequencing from biopsies selected from the biobank was used in cohort 1 (n = 32) and microarray, including the molecular microscope (Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System [MMDx]) algorithm, in recent cohort 2 (n = 30).

Results: The transcriptome of R/DSA was similar to R/DSA as these groups differed in 14 transcripts only. Contrarily, large differences were found between both DSA groups and negative controls. Fast gene set enrichment analyses showed upregulation of the immune system in both DSA groups (gene ontology terms: adaptive immune response, humoral immune response, antigen receptor-mediated signaling, and B-cell receptor signaling or complement activation) when compared with negative controls. MMDx assessment in cohort 2 classified 50% of R/DSA samples as AMR and found no differences in AMR molecular scores between R and R DSA groups. In imlifidase desensitization, MMDx series showed a gradual increase in AMR scores over time.

Conclusions: Presensitized kidney transplant recipients exhibited frequent molecular calls of AMR in biopsy-based transcript diagnostics despite desensitization therapy and negative histology.

References
1.
Halloran P, Reeve J, Akalin E, Aubert O, Bohmig G, Brennan D . Real Time Central Assessment of Kidney Transplant Indication Biopsies by Microarrays: The INTERCOMEX Study. Am J Transplant. 2017; 17(11):2851-2862. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14329. View

2.
Ritchie M, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law C, Shi W . limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e47. PMC: 4402510. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. View

3.
Hruba P, Krejcik Z, Stranecky V, Maluskova J, Slatinska J, Gueler F . Molecular Patterns Discriminate Accommodation and Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation. 2019; 103(5):909-917. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002604. View

4.
Frischknecht L, Deng Y, Wehmeier C, de Rougemont O, Villard J, Ferrari-Lacraz S . The impact of pre-transplant donor specific antibodies on the outcome of kidney transplantation - Data from the Swiss transplant cohort study. Front Immunol. 2022; 13:1005790. PMC: 9532952. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1005790. View

5.
Halloran P, Madill-Thomsen K, Pon S, L N Sikosana M, Bohmig G, Bromberg J . Molecular diagnosis of ABMR with or without donor-specific antibody in kidney transplant biopsies: Differences in timing and intensity but similar mechanisms and outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2022; 22(8):1976-1991. PMC: 9540308. DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17092. View