» Articles » PMID: 39685600

Orthopedic Devices for Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Treatment in Growing Patients: A Comparative Effectiveness Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Dec 17
PMID 39685600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skeletal Class III malocclusion (Cl III) presents a significant orthodontic challenge, particularly in growing patients, requiring interceptive treatment to achieve effective functional and aesthetic correction. This review aims to compare various orthopedic devices and therapeutic protocols used in Cl III correction, identifying the most effective options in an interceptive context. We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published between 1 January 2003, and 19 July 2023. Inclusion criteria included English language, human studies, open access, and studies addressing Cl III correction with interceptive orthopedic devices. Exclusions included in vitro, animal, off-topic studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and articles in languages other than English. After removing duplicates, 30 articles were selected from a total of 1193 results. The application of orthopedic devices in growing patients can lead to rapid improvement of Cl III malocclusion, although each device has specific effects on the surrounding skeletal structure.

References
1.
Inchingolo F, Inchingolo A, Latini G, Ferrante L, Trilli I, Del Vecchio G . Oxidative Stress and Natural Products in Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2024; 16(1). PMC: 10780648. DOI: 10.3390/nu16010113. View

2.
Liu Y, Hou R, Jin H, Zhang X, Wu Z, Li Z . Relative effectiveness of facemask therapy with alternate maxillary expansion and constriction in the early treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159(3):321-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.12.028. View

3.
Godt A, Zeyher C, Schatz-Maier D, Goz G . Early treatment to correct Class III relations with or without face masks. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(1):44-9. DOI: 10.2319/110606-455.1. View

4.
King G, Brudvik P . Effectiveness of interceptive orthodontic treatment in reducing malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(1):18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.023. View

5.
Coloccia G, Inchingolo A, Inchingolo A, Malcangi G, Montenegro V, Patano A . Effectiveness of Dental and Maxillary Transverse Changes in Tooth-Borne, Bone-Borne, and Hybrid Palatal Expansion through Cone-Beam Tomography: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(3). PMC: 8003431. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030288. View