» Articles » PMID: 39682148

Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Dynamics Predict Early Response to Treatment in Metastasized Gastroesophageal Cancer (mGEC) After 2 Weeks of Systemic Treatment

Abstract

Methods: ctDNA detection (ddPCR) was carried out serially in 37 matched tissue (NGS) patients with mGEC prior to systemic treatment initiation and every two weeks thereafter until restaging (n = 173 samples). The results have been correlated with response to treatment (restaging CT), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: The pretherapeutic detection rate was 77.8%. Response to treatment assessment was correct in 54.2% (pretherapeutically pos./neg.) and 85.7% (dynamics at week 4). Moreover, a decline in ctDNA (MAF in %) below 57.1% of the pretherapeutic value after 2 weeks of systemic treatment was accompanied by a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 90% (AUC = 0.73) for correct restaging assessment (response evaluation by CT after 3 months) evaluating 76.5% of patients correctly after only 2 weeks. In contrast to mere pretherapeutic ctDNA positivity ( = 0.445), a decline in ctDNA dynamics to under 57.1% of its initial value was significantly associated with OS (4.1 (95% Cl 2.1-6.1) vs. 13.6 (95% CI 10.4-16.6) months, < 0.001) and PFS (3.2 (1.9-4.5) vs. 9.5 (95% CI 5.5-13.5) months, = 0.001) after two weeks of treatment. Additionally, the change in detectability from positive pretherapeutic levels to negative during treatment was associated with similar survival as for patients who were always regarded as ctDNA-negative (9.5 (95%Cl 0.4-18.5) vs. 9.6 (95%Cl 1.3-17.9)). The absence of becoming undetectable was associated with worse survival (4.7 months).

Conclusions: ctDNA is a promising additional biomarker allowing for early evaluation of response to treatment and saving unevaluated treatment time for patients with mGEC, and could allow for an early change in treatment with anticipated prognostic benefit in the future.

References
1.
Ococks E, Frankell A, Masque Soler N, Grehan N, Northrop A, Coles H . Longitudinal tracking of 97 esophageal adenocarcinomas using liquid biopsy sampling. Ann Oncol. 2020; 32(4):522-532. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.12.010. View

2.
Azad T, Chaudhuri A, Fang P, Qiao Y, Esfahani M, Chabon J . Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease After Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Esophageal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2019; 158(3):494-505.e6. PMC: 7010551. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.039. View

3.
Gao Y, Zhu Y, Yuan Z . Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor DNA Provide New Insights into Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Med Sci. 2016; 13(12):902-913. PMC: 5165683. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.16734. View

4.
Morgan E, Soerjomataram I, Rumgay H, Coleman H, Thrift A, Vignat J . The Global Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Mortality in 2020 and Projections to 2040: New Estimates From GLOBOCAN 2020. Gastroenterology. 2022; 163(3):649-658.e2. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.054. View

5.
Lee Y, Kim D, Kim H, Na K, Lee J, Nam E . Integrating a Next Generation Sequencing Panel into Clinical Practice in Ovarian Cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2019; 60(10):914-923. PMC: 6753345. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.10.914. View