» Articles » PMID: 39681365

Cost-benefit Analysis of Canada's Prison Needle Exchange Program for the Prevention of Hepatitis C and Injection-related Infections

Overview
Journal CMAJ
Date 2024 Dec 16
PMID 39681365
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Needle exchange programs are effective public health interventions that reduce blood-borne infections, including hepatitis C, and injection-related infections. We sought to assess the return on investment of existing Prison Needle Exchange Programs (PNEPs) in Canadian federal prisons and their expansion to all 43 institutions.

Methods: We developed a stochastic compartmental model that estimated hepatitis C and injection-related infections under different PNEP scenarios in Canadian federal prisons. Scenarios projected for 2018-2030 were no PNEP, status quo (actual PNEP implementation 2018-2022, with coverage maintained to 2030), and PNEP scale-up (coverage among people who inject drugs in prison increasing over 2025-2030 to reach 50% by 2030). We calculated the benefit-cost ratio as benefits from health care savings, divided by PNEP costs.

Results: By 2019, PNEPs were implemented in 9 of 43 federal prisons, with uptake reaching 10% of people who injected drugs in prison in 2022. Compared with no PNEP, this was estimated to cost Can$0.45 (uncertainty interval [UI] $0.32 to $0.98) million and avert 37 (UI 25 to 52) hepatitis C and 8 (UI -1 to 16) injection-related infections over 2018-2030, with a benefit-cost ratio of 1.9 (UI 0.56-3.0). Compared with the status quo, the PNEP scale-up scenario cost an additional $2.7 (UI $1.8 to $7.0) million and prevented 224 (UI 218 to 231) hepatitis C and 77 (UI 74 to 80) injection-related infections, with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.0 (UI 0.57 to 3.3).

Interpretation: Every dollar invested in the current PNEP or its expansion is estimated to save $2 in hepatitis C and injection-related infection treatment costs. This return on investment strongly supports ongoing maintenance and scale-up of the PNEP in Canada from an economic perspective.

Citing Articles

Improving implementation of needle and syringe programmes to expand, scale up, and sustain evidence-based prevention interventions for HIV and hepatitis C in prisons.

Kronfli N, Bromberg D, Wolff H, Montanari L, Vasyliev S, Altice F Lancet Public Health. 2024; 10(1):e63-e70.

PMID: 39701113 PMC: 11823114. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00275-5.


The burden of drug overdose deaths among correctional populations: implications for interventions.

Fischer B, Moghimi E, Weekes J CMAJ. 2024; 196(43):E1414-E1416.

PMID: 39681359 PMC: 11649323. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.241661.

References
1.
Merone L, Ashton S, Harris A, Edwards W, Preston-Thomas A, Gair R . A complex increase in hepatitis C virus in a correctional facility: bumps in the road. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022; 46(3):377-381. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13238. View

2.
Brothers T, Lewer D, Jones N, Colledge-Frisby S, Bonn M, Wheeler A . Effect of incarceration and opioid agonist treatment transitions on risk of hospitalisation with injection drug use-associated bacterial infections: A self-controlled case series in New South Wales, Australia. Int J Drug Policy. 2023; 122:104218. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104218. View

3.
Duchesne L, Dussault C, Godin A, Maheu-Giroux M, Kronfli N . Implementing opt-out hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening in Canadian provincial prisons: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Drug Policy. 2021; 96:103345. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103345. View

4.
Cheng Q, Cunningham E, Shih S, Amin J, Bruneau J, Artenie A . Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment Among People Who Inject Drugs. Value Health. 2023; 26(6):883-892. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.016. View

5.
Kronfli N, Buxton J, Jennings L, Kouyoumdjian F, Wong A . Hepatitis C virus (HCV) care in Canadian correctional facilities: Where are we and where do we need to be?. Can Liver J. 2022; 2(4):171-183. PMC: 9202815. DOI: 10.3138/canlivj.2019-0007. View